The motor sees the change electrically, the interface to LinuxCNC does 
not change.

It is all internal to the Gecko drive.

Dave

On 5/1/2012 7:26 AM, cogoman wrote:
> I don't see how they could switch from 1/10 to full step without letting
> LinuxCNC know, and having LinuxCNC reduce the number of steps being
> sent, unless they used a clock multiplier, which would make it look like
> full step to the control, and just use microstepping to smooth out the
> full steps.  The full explanation would be fascinating.
>
> On 05/01/2012 03:52 AM, Peter wrote:
>    
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> Yes, the Geckos are one of the few drives that have electronic
>> anti-resonace built it. The other feature that improves the performance is
>> that they morph from 1/10 to fullstep as the stepper rpm increases. This
>> overcomes the deficiencies of using microstepping at faster rpms, and
>> gives you the best of both worlds.
>>      
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Live Security Virtual Conference
> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
>    


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to