On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 07:38:31 AM andy pugh did opine:

> On 15 May 2012 10:42, charles green <xxzzb...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > the discreet spline teeth are also an approximation.  in fact,
> > anything made out of atoms is flexible and grainy.  why not construct
> > mechanisms from massless rigid rods and such?
> 
> I think Viesturs has a point about the sides being unconstrained in a
> twin-roller arrangement. The sides have the option of flapping like a
> drive belt.
> A combination roller/plain bearing might work, though, imagine a brass
> oval with rollers in the ends. There would be little load on the
> plain-bearing portions, but it would constrain the flex-spline.

I think that would work at elevated speeds only with sufficient liquid flow 
into the clearance to maintain hydrodynamic cushioning.  Metal to metal 
contact would likely hammer the brass out of shape, possibly contaminating 
the interior with particulates before they were expected.

Cheers, Gene
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
My web page: <http://coyoteden.dyndns-free.com:85/gene>
Revolution, n.:
        A form of government abroad.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to