On 07/23/2013 02:40 AM, Andrew wrote: > 2013/7/23 Sebastian Kuzminsky <[email protected]> > >> We don't have a hard deadline for 2.6. We're waiting on a couple of >> other feature branches: the new rtos support branch, and the joints/axes >> branch. Once those go in i'll make the 2.6 branch. > > Sebastian, does that mean that 2.6 will have separate joints and axes like > ja3?
It's not clear yet... I think there are lots of good useful changes in the joints_axes3 branch that i'd like to have in 2.6, but i'm not sure if it's stable enough to merge this time around. I'm currently investigating, i hope we can come to a decision on whether to merge joints_axes3 in the coming weeks. -- Sebastian Kuzminsky ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ See everything from the browser to the database with AppDynamics Get end-to-end visibility with application monitoring from AppDynamics Isolate bottlenecks and diagnose root cause in seconds. Start your free trial of AppDynamics Pro today! http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=48808831&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
