On 04/03/2014 09:26 AM, Michael Haberler wrote:
>
> We are pleased to announce the formation of the Machinekit project [1][2][3].
>
> Machinekit is an overhaul of the real-time and glue infrastructure which 
> supports LinuxCNC. Machinekit is intended to be broadly applicable to 
> real-time control applications.  Non-CNC systems such as general automation 
> and robotics are potential target applications for Machinekit, as is more 
> traditional CNC machine control.  Messaging API support to enable distributed 
> operation across a broad range of platforms including tablets, traditional 
> desktop machines, and embedded systems has progressed considerably and shows 
> first results [4][5][6].
>
> Machinekit will be based on the unified-binary code from the start. The 
> intent is to adopt innovation at a rapid pace while remaining a stable 
> baseline, enable wider adoption by simplifying usage and the contribution 
> process, as well as providing the lowest cost realtime control application 
> supporting ubiquitous UI hardware.
>
> Active community involvement is a critical part of our vision for this peer 
> project so we are adopting the Collective Code Construction Contract (C4) 
> [7].  Our desire is to make it easy for anyone to contribute to the project 
> and to provide objective guidelines for the acceptance and merging of 
> changes.  For an excellent discussion of the C4 contract rationale and 
> building a community around an open source project, see Chapter 6 of the 0MQ 
> guide [8].
>
> Sincerely,
>
> The Machinekit team members:
>
> Michael Haberler
> John Morris
> Charles Steinkuehler
> Kent Reed
> Alexander Rössler
>

Congratulations & Thank You,
Best of success to your project.
I wish the same for the LinuxCNC crew.
You have all done remarkable work.

TomP (tjtr33)

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to