On 26 November 2014 at 19:57, Sebastian Kuzminsky <[email protected]> wrote:
> How would this extra field in the tool db be exposed in HAL?  Wouldn't
> that require changes to IO?

First there would need to be a tool database, but then whatever
plug-in was fielding tool-chang not-NML requests would use the tool
database API to extract the information.
(I didn't say that it was anywhere near happening).

For the application in question it would probably suffice to add
"magic bits" to the pocket number of the tool and bitslice them out.

-- 
atp
If you can't fix it, you don't own it.
http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server
from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards
with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more
Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=157005751&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to