Hi,

IMO

[3] http://www.roboticslibrary.org/

Looks promising, at least from the presentation page, and announced
features, sensor integration kinematics and dynamics,
 it would certainly be useful in several applications.

Probably could attract people from other robotics domains to LinuxCNC.

Unfortunately I cannot help with the work.

Just thinking aloud.


Best regards,

Javier




On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 2:47 AM, Christian Stöveken <
[email protected]> wrote:

> So I looked into the possibilites regarding simulation for a bit
> and found vismach [1] and openrave [2].
>
> I couldn't really get used to vismach.
> Why are the models e.g. puma560 built as scale models?
> It doesn't support collision detection, right?
>
> Also I don't like that the model scripts (python) don't use the parameters
> from the LinucCNC config files, but instead need to be hardcoded and don't
> reside in the machine config folder.
>
> When homing e.g. the puma560 multiple times the 5th /B axis ends up in
> different positions - why?
>
> ^^ so vismach seems to be only a quick hack that I suppose is only intended
> to give LinuxCNC the possibility for some tests without an actual machine?
>
> Openrave on the other hand looks really promising - but is unfortunately
> only
> working with the unmaintained linuxcnc_gen_c branch of ftkalcevic.
>
> Points I'm missing about Vismach / Openrave?
> Did I miss other solutions?
>
> I don't really like either of those and started working on
> getting robotics library [3] running as a simulator for LinuxCNC
> through boost.python. It's not yet working but I'm making progress.
>
> Once the simulator is running I plan on using it for gcode verification
> (collision detection, speed/acceleration/angular limits) - since I would
> like to minimize crashes / other problems with the real robot.
>
> Maybe even path planning is doable and implementing missing PTP features of
> LInuxCNC.
>
> What do you think about roboticslibrary + LinuxCNC?
>
> Another possibility could be Gazebo [4] from ros [5] but I have only just
> built an urdf model and not really put any more effort into it since.
>
>
> [1] http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Vismach
> [2] http://wiki.linuxcnc.org/cgi-bin/wiki.pl?Ikfast
> [3] http://www.roboticslibrary.org/
> [4] http://gazebosim.org/
> [5] http://www.ros.org/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud 
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to