On 6 July 2015 at 11:06, Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: >> Well, you _could_ spend much longer hand-winding your own large-bore >> resolver to get an even better and tougher transducer :-) > > Yes, I could, but I know zip about how those work. URL for a decent tut?
It wasn't a particularly serious suggestion. It ought to be reasonably easy to make a resolver. But making one that gives a linear relationship between angle and output is likely to be very hard, and that is probably what makes them so terribly expensive. http://www.amci.com/tutorials/tutorials-what-is-resolver.asp You could obtain very similar feedback from two analogue proximity sensors at 90 degrees and an eccentric target. -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Don't Limit Your Business. Reach for the Cloud. GigeNET's Cloud Solutions provide you with the tools and support that you need to offload your IT needs and focus on growing your business. Configured For All Businesses. Start Your Cloud Today. https://www.gigenetcloud.com/ _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
