Mach4 does not in any way 'phone home'. Although the code is different 
it works exactly as mach3- you get a license file mailed to you and you 
install it once and it lasts forever.

There was a recent change made to the license code which required a new 
license, so guys using the first version of Mach4 had to use the web 
site to get a new license. The hobby version allows you to self-issue up 
to 5 licenses in a year. Each license is tied to a PC by some code that 
looks at many things, including a MAC address of an ethernet card.

The license is a small pain, but once loaded you are done with it. If 
the world was more honest a license would not be necessary.

In the commercial world users are not scared off by licenses, they are 
running a business and understand it costs to get the kind of commercial 
grade product they want. Mach4 is already in wide use by many OEMs. The 
hobby side is not the focus.

I am not trying to push Mach on this list, I simply want the facts to be 
clear and to try to kill off rumors.

ron ginger


On 9/18/2015 3:39 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 14:22:27 -0400
> From: Dave Cole<[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Emc-users] CAD/CAM for LinuxCNC
> To:[email protected]
> Message-ID:<[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
> On 9/18/2015 1:02 PM, John Dammeyer wrote:
>> >What will really happen ultimately is LinuxCNC will become the dominant CNC
>> >program out there for people who don't want a call home virus running on
>> >their PC.
> I didn't know that it actually "phoned home".   That would be a problem
> for me.
> The licensing model is rather convoluted.  Although I can understand
> them trying to protect their software sales, I suspect that it also scares
> away a number of potential users.
>
>
> Dave


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users

Reply via email to