On Thursday 27 April 2017 18:53:44 andy pugh wrote: > On 27 April 2017 at 23:30, Gene Heskett <[email protected]> wrote: > > But nothing comes out of the lut5 even though the scope is telling > > me the truth table is satisfied. > > addf missing?
Nope. But clarify something for me, please. I, as you saw, make liberal usage of the <= and => stuff just to keep me reminded of whats being sent where. But geany missfired somehow and deleted the name of one on the targets, globally, leaving behind only the .in0's .in1's etc. Also had a couple instances of net "name" where name had no source pointing at it, might still have a couple, but not in this code snippet (I hope) and the load phase of linuxcnc had no objections to either error. Are these <= and => strictly for my edification, and the hal checker totally ignores them? If thats the case, then it should at least fuss about a module.in being used as the "name" reference. IMO only an output should ever be linked to a net "name". With unlimited redirects to other input pins below that first name declaration. Or is that wishfull thinking on my part? Thanks Andy, me, back to the rack/sack after having scrubbed off a bit. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
