how they did that ? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D8BLyMryzQ8&t=175s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wOarxQRKW9o small cube is my. On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 7:42 PM, Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> wrote: > On Sunday 11 March 2018 15:57:59 Chris Albertson wrote: > > > On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 12:28 PM, a k <pccncmach...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I already talk about why I can not use slicing program . > > > > I missed. Maybe you can re-post. > > > > > If one can do change to existing slicing software then I am > > > interesting to talk. > > > > Of course software can be changed. It is just a text file you can > > edit. The key is having EXACT testable requirements. Software > > projects typically fail when the goal can't be clearly stated. > > > > > > One way to state the problem and a proposed solution is to make a most > > simple part possible. If the machine is a 3D printer this simplest > > part might be to draw one line of plastic one nozzle width wide and 1 > > mm long directly on the base place. It would be a tiny part 1mm long > > by 0.4mm wide and 0.2mm tall. The code file would have about 3 or 4 > > lines after a standard "boiler plate". > > > > Don't do exactly that, but if you do start with a very trivial example > > the entire g-code fits in a short email. > > > > The other problem is a procedural. Each email lacks the context of > > there discussion few people will remember details for days able if > > they read 100 emails a day. For example I'm reading/wrinting about > > design of a human-like hand and the cost of linear actuators, about > > ball bearing design and a software project. and a few other things. > > I suspect everyone has multiple projects that move slow. > > > > Maybe the best thing you can do is explain the machine you have and > > the problem to be solved and a method for determining of a proposed > > solution solves the problem. Perhaps place this on a web page so > > you don't have to re-write this 100 times. > > Along about now also seems to be a good place to explain how free > software works. > > Suppose programer A has an itch, so he writes a piece of code that > scratches his itch, and is currently makeing 4000 of this itch scratcher > a day. His itch has been scratched, but your itch isn't in the same > place, so while his solution is similar, he'll have to modify that code > in order to scratch your itch. But he is a working man, and to rewrite > his code to scratch your itch, he'll have to stop whatever he is doing, > which is buying his groceries and making the house payments. Generally > he is going to expect that this missed income will be replaced by > charging you for the time it takes to do this modification. You are not > paying for the code, but the coders time. This makes all the difference > in the GPL world. This modified code is also subject to the GPL in that > if you pass it on to your brother-in-law, the complete src file kit must > be made available to anyone who has a copy of the executable that came > from you. > > There are probably 20+ people on this list who could handle this, (and > I'm not one of them by any means,) but they would want a per diem, all > expenses paid and in person access to the machine at X dollars, Dinar, > Sheckles, whatever the local monetary unit is called, per hour while > they are doing this work if as you claim you aren't able to do it. > > Thats rather harshly stated. But its as often as not, how free (GPL) > software works. > > Too often I have observed that there are folks with plenty of smarts, but > because the code "forest" is not familiar, cannot look and see what its > doing, and without that, haven't the comprehension to look at the > existing code and follow what its doing. And reaching that understanding > will get you to easily seeing a variable that needs changed to get it > closer to scratching "your" itch. > > Often referred to as the TANSTAAFL principle. :) > > -- > Cheers, Gene Heskett > -- > "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: > soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." > -Ed Howdershelt (Author) > Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene> > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
