By the way Nicklas, I attached the manual but it's waiting for approval. If it can't be attached I'll upload to some file storage page.
El sáb., 21 mar. 2020 a las 13:29, Leonardo Marsaglia (< ldmarsag...@gmail.com>) escribió: > Answering to Andy and Gene, > > I'm tracking the position of the spindle (now simulated with this encoder > but in the final machine I'll be using a 1024 PPR encoder) resetting the > position counter after each index pulse and using that as reference for a > new turn of the spindle. > > Do you think it's better for me to only use one index pulse to set the > reference and then count the position output to keep tracking of the > spindle position and whenever I sum 1024 pulses I get one turn? I mean, not > using the index for each revolution, only using it as a reference starting > point. > > > > El sáb., 21 mar. 2020 a las 13:19, Leonardo Marsaglia (< > ldmarsag...@gmail.com>) escribió: > >> You happen to have a datasheet for the ERN471 encoder? >> >> >> I'm attaching it to the message. Hope it uploads. >> >> El sáb., 21 mar. 2020 a las 10:33, Nicklas Karlsson (< >> nicklas.karlsso...@gmail.com>) escribió: >> >>> > On Saturday 21 March 2020 04:04:03 Nicklas Karlsson wrote: >>> > >>> > > > Hello guys, >>> > > > >>> > > > I'm testing a phisical encoder to simulate how the spindle will >>> work >>> > > > with the external offsets. So far so good but I need to clarify >>> > > > something that I suspect. Here it comes: >>> > > > >>> > > > The encoder I'm testing is an ERN471 from Heidenhain. A beast of >>> > > > encoder. It says 5.000 line counts on the datasheet but also says >>> it >>> > > > outputs 125.000 signal periods per revolution, so when I read it in >>> > > > LinuxCNC with a scale of 1 I find that I'm having 500.000 pulses >>> per >>> > > > turn. A lot of resolution. ... >>> > > >>> > > Maybe me stupid. My machine had Heidenhein encoders but I did not get >>> > > them work and replaced them with 2000P/R encoders. >>> > > >>> > Don't be so hard on yourself. Probably the smartest move you could >>> have >>> > made. Those ERN471's would be much more suitable on a fraction of a >>> turn >>> > robotic arm. >>> >>> You happen to have a datasheet for the ERN471 encoder? >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Emc-users mailing list >>> Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users >>> >> _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
