Re: [Emc-users] A simple LinuxCNC system

[Phill C]

> On 29 Apr 2020, at 11:29 am, John Dammeyer <jo...@autoartisans.com> wrote:
> 
> As far as LinuxCNC goes, to me it appears the parallel port code given the 
> steplen calculations there isn't a way to bring the step pulse low again 
> during the same BASE_PERIOD interval which in the HAL file example is 24uS 
> not 10uS.   Therefore I interpret the step pulses to be twice the BASE_PERIOD 
> time.
> 

double step on this page may do that 
<http://linuxcnc.org/docs/2.8/html/hal/parallel-port.html 
<http://linuxcnc.org/docs/2.8/html/hal/parallel-port.html>>
_______________________________________________
Emc-users mailing list
Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users