Thanks for the feedback guys. I'm too used to not using tool wear compensation that I forget about that. I only have to compensate for Z and X differences when they are too much of a trouble for the finishing grinding process after, and I usually do that by hand from time to time. I certainly can give cutter compensation a try.
El lun., 7 sept. 2020 a las 20:49, Jon Elson (<el...@pico-systems.com>) escribió: > On 09/07/2020 03:24 PM, Leonardo Marsaglia wrote: > > Is it any advantage in using cutter compensation when programming the > > g-code using CAM? Because since I've started working with CAM for my > > turning programs I like to let the software do all the compensation. By > the > > way, I'm talking only about lathe programs. I don't know if this could be > > an advantage for the mill machine user. > > > > > The advantage is you can adjust the size of the part or > compensate for tool wear without recreating the G-code. > This is less of an issue today than when G-code programs > came on punched paper tapes. > > Jon > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-users mailing list > Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users > _______________________________________________ Emc-users mailing list Emc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-users
