Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yoni Rabkin Katzenell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Daniel Brockman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> When you have a lot of entries in your playlist, killing >>> and yanking tracks in the PBI gets really, really slow. >> >> [snip] >> >> I'm curious to know, how big is big? I'm all for allowing >> arbitrary sized playlists but I'm wondering if we are >> talking about a practical size. > > I've got, oh, a couple thousand entries. How large are > your playlists, and do you experience the slowness?
Ah, On the rare occasions that I use PBI I have maybe 2 CDs worth of tracks. No wonder the discrepancy. >> If we are, then it definitely needs to be fixed. >> Otherwise we might find ourselves refactoring a lot of >> code for a very small demographic. > > I'd say three thousand entries is pretty much a moderate > playlist size in this day and age. > Wow, I had no idea that playlist ever got that large. Sounds like a usage model in which the playlist is the central repository. I tend to keep everything on the disk and only load into Emms what I want to hear at the time. Still, I see no harm in getting an O(1) PBI into Emms! -- "Cut your own wood and it will warm you twice" _______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
