Jorgen Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Yoni Rabkin Katzenell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> But there is something I don't get. Maybe some darcs guru can explain.
>>
>> When I do a `darcs changes' on forcer's pristine tree I see the
>> following patch:
>>
>> Mon Dec  5 11:20:44 IST 2005  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>   * Killing and yanking
>>
>> So obviously it has already been commited. But when I issue a `darcs
>> send' in the exact same tree, darcs asks me if to send that exact same
>> patch! What am I doing wrong?
>
> I was away for a bit and only now applied your changes to the
> repository, so there must have been an error with the darcs
> changes command. Maybe the tree wasn't as "pristine" as you
> thought it was?
>
> Anyways, considering I'm very short on time recently, I think it's
> a really good idea to send the patches via this list. Thanks.

I think _darcs currently is set to send patches to you by default.  Maybe this
should be changed to the list?  Or are posts from unsubscriberd addresses
blocked / held for approval?

-- 
Trent Buck, Student Errant


_______________________________________________
Emms-help mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help

Reply via email to