Lucas Bonnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Tassilo Horn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Oh, yes. On [1] they say that it will be released this Friday. So maybe >> we can change the preambles (replace 2 with 3 should be enough, right?) >> till then, replace COPYING seconds after it's publicly available and >> release EMMS as the first package released under the GPLv3. > > I released my code under V2 or later, not under V3 only. I don't think > we should change the headers, our code will automatically be licensed > under V2 or V3 as soon as the license is officially out, it will up to > the users to choose which license fits best their needs.
If Emms has been signed off to the FSF, we are not the copyright holders anymore. In a strictly legal sense, it is not our decision. I think that the consequence is that we can't keep Emms GPLv2-only in any case (not that I would want to). So what Lucas suggests is really the only option, that is, GPLv2-or-later. -- "Cut your own wood and it will warm you twice" _______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
