Lucas Bonnet <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I think you'd be better of packaging the HEAD (it should be very >>> stable), or maybe waiting until we manage to release a new version, >>> sometime in 2010 :)
>> Well, I'm waiting :-). What issues are there holding up a >> formal release? > Me lacking time, apart from that, not much. Well, if there is some way I can help, shout :-). > [...] >>> Isn't there some sort of standardized way to guess all this stuff ? I >>> don't want the Makefile to be distro-specific. Using "$(which install-info)" >>> seems too obvious to me to be the proper way. >> Of course: automake :-). It's much better than reinventing >> the wheel yourself, is part of the FSF biosphere and allows >> the user every imaginable freedom to tweak everything. > That's what I was afraid of :) > [...] Why? From a glimpse, the build system shrinks with automake to a third of its current size, looks much tidier and you get all the goodies (compliance with the various GNU stan- dards not the least) for free :-). Tim _______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
