Pierre Neidhardt <[email protected]> writes: > Wow, it's more like 2 tracks per second here on my machine :( > Am I doing something wrong?
Probably not. My "estimate" was really just a guess. > Is there any drawback in using MPD? I actually wonder if MPD shouldn't > be the natural backend for EMMS. Re-implementing caching and metadata > extraction seems like re-inventing the wheel. No. I have used MPD on some machines, it works well. But the version I ran did not recognize albumartist etc. Recent versions do, however. I wouldn't dare to call any backend "natural", as I would expect users to have wildly different setups. They are emacs users, after all... Also, MPD takes more effort to set up properly. Petteri _______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
