On Sat, 26 May 2018 03:36:34 +0500 Mike Kazantsev <mk.frag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 May 2018 18:25:13 -0400 > Yoni Rabkin <y...@rabkins.net> wrote: > > > At least I'm not asking you to modify your idiosyncratic > > indentation. Now _that's_ a red line I wouldn't ask anyone to cross. > > It's some kind of auto-indenter that does that weird tabs-and-spaces > thing which I never looked into, no? > > In which case fix there should be pretty straightforward - run that > formatter before commit and not bother with indentation. Found that lispy-multiline formatter seem to produce good aligned sexp formatting, which seem to be much more in-line with the existing code, so used that. Some existing emms code seem to have a mix of tabs and spaces, which I don't think is consistent (main emms.el can be good example), and probably simply due to indent automation, where emacs auto-inserts tab instead of 4 or 8 spaces (depending on tab-size) sometimes. Used strictly spaces with lispy-multiline formatter for consistency, but shouldn't be a problem to tweak that to use tabs + spaces mix as well, if preferrable. Please let me know if it's gotten better or worse this way. My indentation practices are indeed a bit unorthodox, so I think it'd make sense to ditch these in any collaborative project, especially as it doesn't really take much effort with great tools like lispy fixing it all for you. -- Mike Kazantsev // fraggod.net _______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list Emms-help@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
