Here I was replicating the previous behaviour. Thinking about it: if I don't kill the buffer and I later run the same limiting action, I will want to at least clear the derived buffer so as not to present stale results. So maybe better to just kill it and document it in the doc-string. Either way, I agree that the current doc-string does not capture what the function does.
What do you think? Kill the derived buffer or not? ---Fran On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 at 19:30, Yoni Rabkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've added emms-playlist-limit to the documentation. > > As I was writing it occurred to me that `emms-playlist-limit-to-all' > perhaps should not kill the derived buffer. At least not without adding > a mention of that to the function documentation, which currently simply > reads: "Show all tracks again." > > -- > "Cut your own wood and it will warm you twice" > > _______________________________________________ > Emms-help mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help >
_______________________________________________ Emms-help mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-help
