Hi,
at the moment the source at HEAD identifies the version as
"3.0" in Makefile and lisp/emms.el - this is bad, as it can
lead to confusion with the released 3.0.
I don't think that it is necessary a define a full-fledged
numbering scheme à la alpha, beta, rc1, rc2, release, but I
would like to be able to:
- distinguish hot code being currently developed from code
having been released ("4.0dev" being the predecessor for
"4.0"?), and
- maintain previous releases, i.e., while new features are
being added to the "4.0dev" line, bug fixes (in theory)
are backported to "3.1dev" -> "3.1" (or "3.0.2dev" ->
"3.0.2").
Any thoughts?
Tim
_______________________________________________
Emms-patches mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emms-patches
