Hi everyone, I found a litte problem: For some reason the WTP-Eclipse plugin was commented out on the two struts2 web example projects (empire-db-example-struts2 + empire-db-example-struts2-cxf). I have commented them in and run mvn eclipse:eclipse. For some reason the litte earth symbol that is usually on the top left of the project icon for WTP Projects is not there, but I could choose "debug on server". Then I found, that I got a "Class not found" error. So I checked the Java EE Module dependencies and found that the dependencies were not selected. I selected them but still got the error because for some reason it does not see to load the empire-db-struts2 classes.
My questions: 1. Has anyone managed to run the two web samples projects? 2. What do we need to change that the run off the shelf? 3. Does anyone know whether there is a Maven plugin that's sets up the project for the use with the tomcat sysdeo Eclipse plugin? @Francis: About the wiki: At the moment we have a rather static website. I don't know whether or how to set up a wiki. Sorry. Francis De Brabandere wrote: > Re: ready for release? > > Ok that building.txt is kind of like our readme > we also need some release task list and I need to look into releasing > using meven on the apache infrastructure. I know they have a staging > repository but I'm not sure incubator projects can use it. > > Would it be hard to have a wiki set up for our project? Or is that > planned for after incubation? > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 8:11 PM, Francis De > Brabandere<[email protected]> wrote: > > Concerning the release there might be a difference for incubator > > projects but I'll have a look at it tomorrow. > > > > As for the logging I don't care that the build logs a lot but it's > not > > that I'm against hiding the logging either > > > > Francis > > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Rainer Döbele<[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Francis, > >> > >> well I did it myself on my machine and I was just thinking about it. > >> My personal opinion is, that I don't need log output from tests for > every build - all I need to know is whether any of the tests failed at > all. If so, I can investigate on this specific test. > >> But it's a personal opinion. > >> Write the log output to a file sounds like a good idea to me too. > >> > >> The next question is: Do we now put it up for voting or not. > >> Is there anything else we can or must supply. > >> > >> Apache CXF has a nice document called "BUILDING.txt" that explains > how to build with Maven. > >> We could adapt this for our release. > >> > >> @Jörg are you still reading this. What's your opinion? > >> > >> Regards > >> Rainer > >> > >> Francis De Brabandere wrote: > >>> Re: logging of unit tests > >>> > >>> So I set the level to FATAL and put those parse warnings back to > error > >>> then? Should I convert the log4j settings to xml format? > >>> > >>> But if you are not interested in them maybe we can just log to a > file > >>> in the target folder instead of console? > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Rainer Döbele<[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > Hi Francis, > >>> > > >>> > thanks a lot. > >>> > Now I can see where the properties for log4j are set. > >>> > I didn't think about looking in src/test/resources - but its > logical. > >>> > Usually we use an embedded xml configuration instead of a > properties > >>> file. > >>> > > >>> > The output is much better, however I would even consider setting > the > >>> debug level to FATAL instead of WARN. > >>> > The overall result is measured anyway and there is IMO not much > >>> benefit in having the log output there. > >>> > What do you think? > >>> > > >>> > Regards > >>> > Rainer > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > Francis De Brabandere wrote: > >>> >> Re: revive the release process > >>> >> > >>> >> Changed those errors to warnings for logging since a default > value > >>> is > >>> >> provided these are no real exceptions. > >>> >> Also set the unit test default log level to WARN > >>> >> > >>> >> Let me know if this is ok, we could also keep them at error > level > >>> and > >>> >> not provide the stack trace. I don't know of an option in log4j > to > >>> >> hide the traces > >>> >> > >>> >> What do you think? > >>> >> > >>> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Francis De > >>> >> Brabandere<[email protected]> wrote: > >>> >> > Hi Rainer, > >>> >> > > >>> >> > I'll have a look at the logging this evening. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Rainer > Döbele<[email protected]> > >>> >> wrote: > >>> >> >> Hi Francis (and everyone interested), > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> after it has been very quiet on the dev-mailing list > recently, I > >>> >> would like to revive the release process of empire-db 2.0.5 in > order > >>> to > >>> >> be able to go ahead with some possibly bigger changes. > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> The current assembly builds well and I as far as I can tell > all > >>> >> required legal documents are there. > >>> >> >> However, there is one thing that annoys me: > >>> >> >> The JUnit test-code produces very verbose output - including > some > >>> >> exceptions. > >>> >> >> Those exceptions are intended and handled properly - but are > >>> >> confusing. > >>> >> >> @Francis: is there a way of disabling log output when running > the > >>> >> unit tests? > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Apart from that the assembly is fine to me. > >>> >> >> Anyone else to comment the assembly before we put it up for > >>> voting? > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> Regards > >>> >> >> Rainer > >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > > >>> >> > -- > >>> >> > http://www.somatik.be > >>> >> > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > >>> >> > > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> -- > >>> >> http://www.somatik.be > >>> >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> http://www.somatik.be > >>> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > http://www.somatik.be > > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > > > > > > -- > http://www.somatik.be > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
