Should I create an other RC on sunday (or monday) evening or do we want to wait for some more reviews on the general@ list?
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Francis De Brabandere <[email protected]> wrote: > I got this fixed by adding deployment skipping for our examples module: > <build> > <pluginManagement> > <plugins> > <plugin> > <!-- skip deployment for all examples > --> > <artifactId>maven-deploy-plugin</artifactId> > <configuration> > <skip>true</skip> > </configuration> > </plugin> > </plugins> > </pluginManagement> > </build> > > As you can see in the latest snapshot builds the examples are not > being deployed any more: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/snapshots/org/apache/empire-db/ > > Now for the staging repo I fear we'll have to create an other RC as I > can not remove folders there. > > Cheers, > Francis > > On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 10:24 AM, Francis De Brabandere > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I was thinking the same thing. There seems to be a way to disable a >> deploy, we could then skip deployment to the staging repository for >> all examples >> >> Cheers, >> Francis >> >> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Rainer Döbele <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Hi Francis, >>> >>> OK the two war files in the Maven staging area are wrong. >>> >>> But can't we just delete them. >>> Everything else should be OK. >>> >>> What do you think? >>> >>> Rainer >>> >>> >>> Rainer Döbele wrote: >>>> re: About the war (sounds funny, doesn't it) >>>> >>>> >>>> OK, shame on me. >>>> It's in the Maven staging area as sebb said. >>>> Should have read it properly. >>>> Well, that is not so good I must admit. >>>> >>>> Are any examples required in the stating area at all? >>>> Isn't this what is supposed to go into a public repository. >>>> So wouldn't empire-db-core and empire-db-struts2 be sufficient? >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Rainer >>>> >>>> >>>> Rainer Döbele wrote: >>>> > re: About the war (sounds funny, doesn't it) >>>> > >>>> > Hi Francis, >>>> > >>>> > I still don't see the problem. The war is not in the release and hence >>>> > there is no problem. >>>> > >>>> > Rainer >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >>>> > > Von: Francis De Brabandere [mailto:[email protected]] >>>> > > Gesendet: Freitag, 11. September 2009 22:19 >>>> > > An: [email protected] >>>> > > Betreff: Re: About the war (sounds funny, doesn't it) >>>> > > >>>> > > I just added an other reply to the thread, we could just release the >>>> > > source for those. I do agree that war has no value. >>>> > > >>>> > > It's just a side-effect of maven that he builds a binary for each >>>> > > module. I'll try to find a solution for that... >>>> > > Sorry about this, I did not think it was going to be this big of an >>>> > > issue... >>>> > > >>>> > > Cheers, >>>> > > Francis >>>> > > >>>> > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 10:13 PM, Rainer Döbele <[email protected]> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > > > Hi Francis, >>>> > > > >>>> > > > there is no war file in the distribution is there? >>>> > > > >>>> > > > But IMO we don't have to let Maven build one either. >>>> > > > What is it good for? >>>> > > > People usually run the web app from their IDE. >>>> > > > So if this would be a problem, we just won't build one. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > But I really think (and hope) that sebb had some other problem. >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Regards >>>> > > > Rainer >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Francis De Brabandere wrote: >>>> > > >> Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5) >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> >> > [X] -1 >>>> > > >> >> >>>> > > >> >> Distribution archives are broken. >>>> > > >> > >>>> > > >> > Maven artifacts don't have correct N&L files. >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> That war contains jar's that each contain their own license and >>>> > notice >>>> > > >> files. Should we take those over in an extra N&L? How do you want >>>> us >>>> > > >> to keep track of all transitive dependencies in the future. If one >>>> of >>>> > > >> the projects we depend on takes an extra dependency we also have to >>>> > > >> add it, there is no easy way to handle this? >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> -- >>>> > > >> http://www.somatik.be >>>> > > >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. >>>> > > >> >>>> > > >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> -- >>>> > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >>>> > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > -- >>>> > > http://www.somatik.be >>>> > > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> http://www.somatik.be >> Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. >> > > > > -- > http://www.somatik.be > Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house. > -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
