Is that really a problem? I'm just creating a dist after the maven release was performed. I don't see an other way. Both have been created from the same tag so I don't see this as an issue. We create a tag to be able to reproduce an identical build...
Cheers, Francis On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:18 PM, Rainer Döbele <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi everybody > > first I want to thank Thomas a lot for his thorough review. > That sounds promising and it's likely we're close now. > > It appears that the difference in the jars is a result of a difference in the > file META-INF\maven\org.apache.empire-db\empire-db\pom.properties > > The difference is in line 2 where it gives the generation timestamp: > The repo version has: #Mon Sep 07 21:43:02 GMT+01:00 2009 > The dist version has: #Mon Sep 07 21:59:32 GMT+01:00 2009 > > For the empire-db-struts2-2.0.5-incubating.jar its probably the same thing. > > So we have to make sure that those jars get only generated once. > Francis do you think this is a problem? > > If you can solve that, and the issue with the examples in the maven repo then > I will be happy to vote on rc6. If I can be of any further help just let me > know. > > Rainer > > > > Thomas Fischer wrote: >> RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.0.5-incubating (rc5) >> >> I have checked the release and I have found the following issues: >> - jar files in the maven2 repo and the distribution differ. No idea how >> this can happen. (see below)) >> - francis' signature is not in the KEYS.txt on the website. (see >> below)) >> >> Everything else looks good, except the issues sebb found. >> >> If these issues are fixed, an rc will get a +1 from me >> >> Thomas >> >> I have checked the following: >> >> staging repo: >> - empire-db >> - jar contains NOTICE and LICENSE >> >> -empire-db-struts2 >> - jar contains NOTICE and LICENSE >> >> -empire-db-example-advanced >> - jar contains NOTICE and LICENSE >> >> -empire-db-example-basic >> - jar contains NOTICE and LICENSE >> >> -empire-db-example-cxf >> - jar contains NOTICE and LICENSE >> >> rat report looks good >> >> distribution: >> - NOTICE, LICENSE and DISCLAIMER look good >> - javadoc looks good >> - sources look good >> - sources build >> - unit tests pass >> - all required dependencies are available from central repository, >> - docs (README.txt, tutorial.pdf) look good >> - md5 and sha1 sums are correct >> - signatures are correct, however, francis' key is not in the KEYS.txt. >> This needs to be fixed. >> >> compare maven repo and distribution: >> - empire-db-2.0.5-incubating.jar in staging repo and in zip/tgz differ >> binaryly. The file size in the staging repository is 269.663 bytes, >> whereas >> in the sistribution, it is 269.664 bytes. >> empire-db-struts2-2.0.5-incubating.jar also seems to be different, but >> has >> same file size. >> >> Regards, >> >> Thomas >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- http://www.somatik.be Microsoft gives you windows, Linux gives you the whole house.
