The problem is most likely C++ name mangling. If you declare the function
with C linkage (i.e. with extern "C" { unsigned int fibonacci(unsigned int
n); } ) then it should be non-mangled. Of course that will prevent you from
overloading it, but it will make bindings easier.

On Sun, Sep 3, 2017 at 2:07 AM Maga D. Zandaqo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is there any way to expose simple C++ functions with WebIDL without
> wrapping them into classes? E.g. I have a function in say fibonacci.cpp:
>
> unsigned int fibonacci(unsigned int n) {
>   return fib(n, 0, 1);
> }
>
> I tried exposing it in WebIDL as:
> callback fibonacci = long (long n);
>
> But that doesn't seem to work, the resulting module doesn't have a
> function called fibonacci on it.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "emscripten-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to