How did the issue present itself before you enabled UBSAN?   (Are you sure
its the same issue?)

Is there some way you could make/share a minimal repro case?

cheers,
sam



On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 7:13 AM 'Mike Lischke' via emscripten-discuss <
emscripten-discuss@googlegroups.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I have a memory alignment problem in a library, which I want to use via
> wasm. To get more information I enabled USAN which reported the error, but
> it makes no sense to me, because the error is within the STL, not my code.
> The class I use is std::unordered_set<> with a custom hasher and a custom
> comparer. The pointer given to the `insert` method (the error happens
> already on first insertion) is aligned, I triple checked that. Here's the
> full stack trace:
>
> This is the pointer that should be inserted in the set:
>
> proposed: 0x3bebe8
>
> /opt/homebrew/Cellar/emscripten/3.1.43/libexec/cache/sysroot/include/c++/v1/__memory/unique_ptr.h:469:12:
> runtime error: reference binding to misaligned address 0x3307474f for type
> 'std::__hash_node_base<std::__hash_node<antlr4::dfa::DFAState *, void *> *>
> *', which requires 4 byte alignment
> 0x3307474f: note: pointer points here
> RuntimeError: memory access out of bounds
>     at __ubsan::Diag::~Diag()
> (wasm://wasm/0a18e74a:wasm-function[23303]:0xa1fae2)
>     at handleTypeMismatchImpl(__ubsan::TypeMismatchData*, unsigned long,
> __ubsan::ReportOptions) (wasm://wasm/0a18e74a:wasm-function[23315]:0xa20b40)
>     at __ubsan_handle_type_mismatch_v1
> (wasm://wasm/0a18e74a:wasm-function[23314]:0xa20695)
>     at
> std::__2::unique_ptr<std::__2::__hash_node_base<std::__2::__hash_node<antlr4::dfa::DFAState*,
> void*>*>* [],
> std::__2::__bucket_list_deallocator<std::__2::allocator<std::__2::__hash_node_base<std::__2::__hash_node<antlr4::dfa::DFAState*,
> void*>*>*>>>::operator[][abi:v160004](unsigned long) const
> (wasm://wasm/0a18e74a:wasm-function[16520]:0x6dde0a)
>     at
> std::__2::pair<std::__2::__hash_iterator<std::__2::__hash_node<antlr4::dfa::DFAState*,
> void*>*>, bool> std::__2::__hash_table<antlr4::dfa::DFAState*,
> antlr4::dfa::DFA::DFAStateHasher, antlr4::dfa::DFA::DFAStateComparer,
> std::__2::allocator<antlr4::dfa::DFAState*>>::__emplace_unique_key_args<antlr4::dfa::DFAState*,
> antlr4::dfa::DFAState* const&>(antlr4::dfa::DFAState* const&,
> antlr4::dfa::DFAState* const&)
> (wasm://wasm/0a18e74a:wasm-function[16515]:0x6dbbfb)
>     at std::__2::__hash_table<antlr4::dfa::DFAState*,
> antlr4::dfa::DFA::DFAStateHasher, antlr4::dfa::DFA::DFAStateComparer,
> std::__2::allocator<antlr4::dfa::DFAState*>>::__insert_unique[abi:v160004](antlr4::dfa::DFAState*
> const&) (wasm://wasm/0a18e74a:wasm-function[16387]:0x6cb146)
>     at std::__2::unordered_set<antlr4::dfa::DFAState*,
> antlr4::dfa::DFA::DFAStateHasher, antlr4::dfa::DFA::DFAStateComparer,
> std::__2::allocator<antlr4::dfa::DFAState*>>::insert[abi:v160004](antlr4::dfa::DFAState*
> const&) (wasm://wasm/0a18e74a:wasm-function[16382]:0x6ca8f2)
>     at
> antlr4::atn::LexerATNSimulator::addDFAState(antlr4::atn::ATNConfigSet*,
> bool) (wasm://wasm/0a18e74a:wasm-function[16379]:0x6c9deb)
>     at antlr4::atn::LexerATNSimulator::matchATN(antlr4::CharStream*)
> (wasm://wasm/0a18e74a:wasm-function[16306]:0x6a4858)
>     at antlr4::atn::LexerATNSimulator::match(antlr4::CharStream*, unsigned
> long) (wasm://wasm/0a18e74a:wasm-function[16291]:0x6a095c)
>
> To me it looks like the set tries to insert a random memory address. I
> added console logging in the entire path, including the hasher, to see
> what's going on (feeling like debugging in the 90s :-( ) and everything
> looks good. The hash is created and looks valid, but after that the crash
> happens. So what else could I do to debug further?
>
> For completeness, this is how the set member is defined:
>
> std::unordered_set<DFAState *, DFAStateHasher, DFAStateComparer> states;
> // States are owned by this class.
>
> No unique pointers involved here, so this must be something internal to
> the set.
>
> Mike
> --
> www.soft-gems.net
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "emscripten-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/ECB3B320-77B3-4B6E-A51C-8199FC547AAB%40googlemail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/ECB3B320-77B3-4B6E-A51C-8199FC547AAB%40googlemail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"emscripten-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to emscripten-discuss+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/emscripten-discuss/CAL_va2-eEvdH3LBcenC7bLnVWmvsHmmWo2gqnweYzdeARZG%3DZA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to