My feeling is that between an offer to host both vs. one; the former
offer is likely to be looked upon more favorably for reasons of
logistics and in consideration for those who would likely wish to attend
both (maybe a handful).

That should not stop anyone from making what offer they can/willing to.

-mani
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lakshminath
Dondeti
Sent: Friday, November 17, 2006 10:18 AM
To: Charles Clancy; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Hokeyp] [Emu] CAPWAP and HOKEY interim meetings

Not sure how the flight schedules work, but it would be good to have 
2 days for HOKEY too.  The evening between the first and the second 
days of the meeting can be used for offline discussions to come to
consensus.

On hosting, does one have to host both meetings? :)  I can make a 
case for a HOKEY meeting in QUALCOMM.

regards,
Lakshminath

At 10:01 AM 11/17/2006, Charles Clancy wrote:
>CAPWAP and HOKEY WGs,
>
>The chairs of both CAPWAP and HOKEY feel an interim meeting between
IETF
>67 and 68 is necessary in order to meet their respective milestones.
Due
>to a likely overlap in some participants, consecutive, co-located
meetings
>are suggested.
>
>The chairs propose to hold a 3-day event (1 day for HOKEY followed by 2
>days for CAPWAP) in the San Francisco Bay area the week of January 22.
Due
>to a preference of not traveling on weekends, meeting Tue-Thu (Jan
23-25)
>is suggested.  Please send comments to the lists on the proposed
schedule,
>area, preference on dates, and which meeting(s) you're likely to
attend.
>Also please indicate any possible overlooked conflicts with conferences
>and other events.
>
>If your organization would be interested in providing a venue to host
the
>event, please let us know.  In particular, we are interested in your
>site's space availability, accessibility to visitors, guest Internet
>connectivity, ability to provide lunch, and proximity to a major
airport
>and reasonably-priced hotels.
>
>Thanks!
>
>--
>t. charles clancy, ph.d.  <>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  <>  www.cs.umd.edu/~clancy
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Emu mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

_______________________________________________
Hokeyp mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.opendiameter.org/mailman/listinfo/hokeyp



_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to