Gene Chang (genchang) wrote: > It is not unusual for developers to be unaware of the breath of the > EAP-FAST market adoption. It has been growing under the radar for a lot > of people since market research firms do not track market share of > different EAP methods.
I do rather a bit more than just development. I work with people deploying systems from 100 to 10M+ users. I don't see EAP-FAST being adopted. I *do* hear rumors about EAP-FAST from enterprises who have bought single source solutions. > Part of the misperception that EAP-FAST has no market presence has been > because no one has been drawing attention to the adoption success of > EAP-FAST. I am hoping to assemble some public data to shed a light on > the secret life of EAP-FAST. People haven't drawn attention to the adoption success of PEAP or TTLS, either. Instead, people just deployed it in large numbers. I started hearing about PEAP and TTLS almost as soon as they were proposed. There was quick and immediate demand for both protocols from a wide range of systems (small, medium, large). I've seen nothing similar happen with EAP-FAST (so far). Part of the misperception that EAP-FAST has a large market presence has been that the people who are deploying it don't talk to the people *not* deploying it, and vice versa. Within the EAP-FAST camp, it looks like there's wide-spread adoption. Outside of it, it just doesn't come up in any conversation. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
