#12: TLS Extensions > Section 4.2.1.3 > > " In order to meet the requirements in this document TLS > extensions MAY > be used. For example, TLS extensions may be useful in providing > certificate revocation information via the TLS OCSP extension (thus > meeting the requirement in Section 4.5.1.3)." > > Why is it necessary to include optional requirements in this document? > Presumably the selection will only be influenced by MUST and > SHOULD requirements, right? > This section is just stating that it is acceptable to use TLS extensions to meet requirements. I don't see a problem here.
-- Ticket URL: <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/emu/trac/ticket/12> emu <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/emu/> _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
