Hoeper Katrin-QWKN37 wrote: > I did not attend the last EMU WG meeting in person, but as a remote > participant it appeared to me that there was a general consensus that > the channel binding draft (draft-ietf-emu-chbind-05) should reference > “EAP Method Support for Transporting AAA Payloads” > (http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-clancy-emu-aaapay-04.txt) as solution > for transporting channel binding information.
We need to confirm on the list (a) what we propose, and (b) whether or not it has consensus. > In that case, shouldn’t we make this draft a working group item? Right > now it is still a personal draft. Sam's suggestion (IIRC) was to merge the two documents. The channel binding document is small, and may be better served by specifying the protocol, too. Alan DeKok. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
