Q1:Yes Q2: I support using EAP-Team since it more fits for requrements defined in I-D.ietf-emu-eaptunnel-req. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alan DeKok" <al...@deployingradius.com> To: <emu@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2011 2:29 PM Subject: [Emu] Consensus call on EAP Tunneled method
> For people who didn't attend the EMU meeting at IETF, please answer > the following consensus call: > > Question 1: Are you ready to make a decision on the EAP tunneled method? > > Please indicate Yes or No. > > Question 2: If the answer to Question 1 is "Yes", please indicate > support for one of the two proposed methods: > > FASTv2 > or > EAP-Team > > Alan DeKok. > EMU Co-Chair > _______________________________________________ > Emu mailing list > Emu@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu > _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
