Dear all, I support the inclusion of EAP-over-CoAP to the charter.
We've done work on this particular item in the past, and we've identified the need for it in many places.. but unfortunately the draft didn't have a proper "home" and things never advanced much. Use-cases we've seen include places where EAP is a MUST, there is support for CoAP, but no support for the specific FOO technology. I am confident that it will bring value to the IOT ecosystem and that ACE is the right home for this draft. Cheers, Alexander On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 12:46 PM Dan Garcia <dan.gar...@um.es> wrote: > Hi Michael, > > EAP can be used in the context of IoT for authentication. To transport EAP > from the IoT device we need a light EAP lower-layer. This would be CoAP. > Morover, according to EAP key management framework, keys are exported to > protect the link and the EAP lower-layer itself. So yes, OSCORE could be > used for that kind of protection. > > Another aspect, it is that the use case we consider is the case where an > IoT device is trying to access a security domain under the control of a > “controller” that is connected to a backend AAA infrastructure, which acts > as EAP authenticator. > > Best Regards. > El 07/12/2020 a las 23:09, Michael Richardson escribió: > > Could someone point to a use case for "EAP over CoAP" please? > Is the goal to key an OSCORE context, or what? > > -- > ] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [ > ] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works | IoT architect [ > ] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/ | ruby on rails > [ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ace mailing listAce@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace > > _______________________________________________ > Ace mailing list > a...@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ace >
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
