Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-emu-eap-noob-05: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-eap-noob/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks for the many updates to address my Discuss and Comment points. Just a few final thoughts from reading the diff from -04 to -05: Section 5.6 It's interesting to see the eap-noob.arpa registration lose discussion about who should care and why (i.e., the list from RFC 6761). I guess I see how it's not specifically required by 6761 itself, but it seemed useful to think about. Section 7.2 The first and second paragraphs both start with the same sentence, which makes me suspect that there are some editing remnants left. Section 7.7 Many thanks for adding this treatment of channel binding. The actual properties provided are weaker than I'd like, but attempting to diverge from RFC 6677 in this document seems unlikely to actually be useful, so I'll have to accept what is possible. _______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
