Hi all,

I have a simple question regarding draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls-01

Do you see the scope of this specification limited to the use for wired network 
access? In Section 2.1 you describe the story as "use DPP if the device 
bootstraps against a Wi-Fi network, or TLS-POK if the device bootstraps against 
a wired network."

If that's the goal, I think it would be useful to move this text from Section 
2.1 into the introduction.

I was also wondering whether it would be better to change the title of the 
document from "Bootstrapped TLS Authentication" to something like "Bootstrapped 
TLS Authentication with Proof of Knowledge (TLS-POK)".

Minor remarks:

There is a reference to RFC 9528, which is marked as a broken reference. Most 
likely a typo and you mean RFC 9258 instead.

You say: "Device on-boarding protocols such as the Device Provisioning Profile 
[DPP], also referred to as Wi-Fi Easy Connect, address this use case but they 
have drawbacks." Then, you only mention one drawback. Maybe you want to mention 
other drawbacks.

The terminology section should contain the RFC 2119 boilerplate text.

Ciao
Hannes

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are 
confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any 
other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any 
medium. Thank you.

_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu

Reply via email to