The list in section 4.2.1 "General TLV Format" includes: 11 PAC TLV (DEPRECATED)
I suggest re-adding the subsection for PAC TLV with a brief note that it's deprecated. This would serve as reminder that TLV number 11 did exist and it would also keep the section numbering unchanged making it easier to compare RFC 7170 and its updated version. This is a purely an editorial idea. Section 7.7. "Security Claims": When the draft source is processed, incorrect renumbering happens. First, see this line https://github.com/emu-wg/rfc7170bis/blob/main/draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis.md?plain=1#L3363 Then compare it to the processed HTML version. https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-emu-rfc7170bis-12.html Updating the draft source file from '2.' to 'Note 2.", and similarly for note 1, likely fixes this. Appendix A.4. and A.5. both say that TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA is a mandatory ciphersuite and then refer to section 3.2. for more information. Section 3.2. has the updated information but A.4. and A.5. still have old RFC 7170 ciphersuite. Example flows C.11., C.12. and C.13. are not named. -- Heikki Vatiainen h...@radiatorsoftware.com
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list Emu@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
