Dear Hannes:
PANA is an EAP lower-layer. As our I-D mentions, we are defining an EAP
lower-layer based on CoAP, which fits better for constrained devices and
networks. Moreover, the idea is to re-use a CoAP implementation in the
constrained device to design this EAP lower-layer. On the other hand,
CoAP not only works on top of UDP but also with TCP or Websocket. In
conclusion, I do not see CoAP-EAP as PANAv2 but understand your comment
since they are both EAP lower-layers.
Best Regards.
El 30/10/23 a las 11:59, Hannes Tschofenig escribió:
Thanks for the pointer to the appendix.
If I understand the write-up correctly, then you are defining a new
version of PANA. The main difference is that PANA uses UDP to carry EAP
and this document uses CoAP over UDP to carry EAP.
Do I understand the use cases correctly?
Ciao
Hannes
Am 16.10.2023 um 11:37 schrieb Dan Garcia Carrillo:
Hi Hannes,
Thank you for your time to review the document.
Regarding your question, in the annex there are different use cases
about the usage of CoAP-EAP.
If you think there is some additional use case that should be
considered, please, let us know.
Best Regards.
El 13/10/23 a las 10:27, Hannes Tschofenig escribió:
Hi all,
I have read through <draft-ietf-ace-wg-coap-eap> and was wondering what
use case motivated the work on EAP over CoAP.
Where is it planned to be used?
Ciao
Hannes
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu__;!!D9dNQwwGXtA!SDp1CT246dHVgSOcyJXTHJUhaEJclytG6kz6jKqO0J3iSG66HzTTcPeHvUhmIAYd6eanoezHBOdULk0cYE3YhKbjeval$
_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list
Emu@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/emu
