Hi Michael, Yes, most of those questions are discussed throughout the paper.
Best regards, Francisco. ________________________________ De: Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> Enviado: lunes, julio 14, 2025 4:05:41 p. m. Para: FRANCISCO LOPEZ GOMEZ <francisco.lop...@um.es> CC: Peter Yee <pe...@akayla.com>; GABRIEL LOPEZ MILLAN <gab...@um.es>; emu@ietf.org <emu@ietf.org> Asunto: Re: [Emu] Re: WGLC for draft-ietf-emu-eap-edhoc FRANCISCO LOPEZ GOMEZ <francisco.lop...@um.es> wrote: > We have developed some POC implementations of EAP-EDHOC, including an > EAP-Peer implementation in WPA_Supplicant, an EAP-Server implementation > in HostAP and an EAP-Server implementation in FreeRADIUS. We also had a > small interoperability test with another implementation from the > University of Oviedo during the 2024 Paris Hackathon on Lightweight IoT > Security, organized by the LAKE working group > (https://parishackathon.lakewg.org/). 1. Can you contrast packet sizes over "LAN", and across "WAN" (radius encapsulated) of EAP-EDHOC versus EAP-TLS? 2. What EDHOC modes did you implement, and were any of them using *certificates* for client or server? 3. Were any of these implementations on class M (7228bis) devices? What's the win here? > Finally, if of interest to the community, our paper on EAP-EDHOC, which > includes performance results, has just been published: > https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0920548925000662. It > will be freely available as open access in the coming days. As > described in the paper, the method was also deployed in a real Wi-Fi > scenario using a physical access point. maybe answers to the above are in the paper. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+i...@sandelman.ca> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
_______________________________________________ Emu mailing list -- emu@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to emu-le...@ietf.org
