Mohamed Boucadair has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls-08: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to 
https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-emu-bootstrapped-tls/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hi Owen and Dan,

Thank you for the effort put into this specification.

I have a concern with this text:

CURRENT:
   Thus, the intention is that DPP is the
   RECOMMENDED mechanism for bootstrapping against Wi-Fi networks, and
   TLS-POK is the RECOMMENDED mechanism for bootstrapping against wired
   networks.

I guess these recommendations target network operators. It is not clear to me
why are we making a recommendation about DPP. Also, not sure this document is
the place to self-promote the proposed TLS-POK.

Rather than trying to formulate any recommendations, I think that it is more
appropriate to simply set the applicability scope of the proposal.

Cheers,
Med





_______________________________________________
Emu mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to