5th session of the United Nations Forum on Forests  -  Issue #5 

EARTH NEGOTIATIONS BULLETIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR 
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (IISD) <http://www.iisd.org>

Written and edited by:

Andrew Baldwin 
Deborah Davenport, Ph.D. 
Radoslav Dimitrov, Ph.D. 
Reem Hajjar 
Peter Wood 

Editor:

Pamela S. Chasek, Ph.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Director, IISD Reporting Services:

Langston James "Kimo" Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Vol. 13 No. 127
Friday, 20 May 2005

Online at http://www.iisd.ca/forestry/unff/unff5/ 

UNFF-5 HIGHLIGHTS:

THURSDAY, 19 MAY 2005

On Thursday morning, delegates met in concurrent Working Groups. 
Working Group I met to consider the Chair's draft decision on the 
future international arrangement on forests (IAF). Working Group 
II met to discuss draft elements of the ministerial declaration as 
well as the issue of finance relating to the IAF. Regional group 
consultations continued throughout the day. 

WORKING GROUP I

Vice-Chair Reslan Ishar Jenie (Indonesia) opened the discussion on 
review of the effectiveness of the international arrangement on 
forests (IAF), consideration of future actions, consideration with 
a view to recommending the parameters of a mandate for developing 
a legal framework on all types of forests, and enhanced 
cooperation, and introduced the Chair's draft decision. A number 
of delegations said the Chair's draft text is a good basis for 
discussion. JAMAICA, on behalf of the G-77/CHINA, requested 
additional time to examine the text. LUXEMBOURG, on behalf of the 
EU, supported by AUSTRALIA and the US, said it is important to 
give the G-77/CHINA the requested time. The DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF 
CONGO and CUBA noted that only an English version of the draft 
text had been provided, requested translated versions, and urged 
the Secretariat to follow UN procedures. The Secretariat noted 
serious limitations in providing document translation. Vice-Chair 
Ishar Jenie suspended the meeting to grant the G-77/CHINA time for 
consultation.

WORKING GROUP II

Vice-Chair Denys Gauer (France) opened Working Group II by 
suggesting that detailed discussion of the draft ministerial 
declaration be set aside in favor of a general exchange of views 
on global goals and financial aspects. LUXEMBOURG, on behalf of 
the EU, stated that he was ready to discuss goals, but not 
financial aspects. JAMAICA, on behalf of the G-77/CHINA, requested 
additional time for group consultations. MAURITANIA suggested that 
initiatives aimed at combating deforestation be focussed on 
underlying causes. The US expressed willingness to discuss initial 
general reactions on goals and means of implementation. 
SWITZERLAND, while acknowledging the G-77/CHINA's need for further 
consultation, suggested that Working Group II proceed with 
deliberations in order to allow enough time for producing a 
meaningful outcome. 

LUXEMBOURG, on behalf of the EU, suggested that the Chair's draft 
ministerial declaration should convey the importance of forests in 
pursuit of the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), deliver a 
clear message to the Millennium Summit, and contain key messages 
emerging from the ministerial roundtables.

The US supported the EU but noted the need to focus on 
strengthening the future IAF and provide compelling language on 
why the ministers are taking this action. She also cautioned that 
the real objective of the declaration is not to tie the 
contributions of forests only to the MDGs but to social, economic, 
and environmental goals in general, for greater longevity within 
the broader international dialogue.

SWITZERLAND also noted that linking the declaration directly to 
the MDGs could be misleading, and suggested that more weight be 
given to innovative approaches to providing means of 
implementation and advocated explicit mention of strengthening 
governance at all levels.

Vice-Chair Gauer proposed that a second draft declaration be 
produced next Monday, following Friday's discussion.

On global goals, the US called for a clear statement of purpose 
that would be understood by others. She favored identifying 
flexible policies and actions at the national level, which would 
contribute to achieving agreed-upon objectives, rather than 
setting quantified international targets.

LUXEMBOURG, on behalf of the EU, called for establishing 
quantifiable global goals in order to send a clear message on 
forests, as well as national targets, which should be related to 
the global goals. He reminded participants that other processes 
have succeeded in establishing quantified objectives.

SWITZERLAND stated that the original Economic and Social Council 
decision establishing the IAF should be reaffirmed in the preamble 
as well as in a separate paragraph within the text, and preferred 
that the text include a small number of quantifiable global goals. 
MEXICO favored quantifiable global goals associated with clear 
time frames, with self-defined national targets. NEW ZEALAND 
suggested the inclusion of realistic and measurable global goals 
capable of demonstrating the potential of forests to contribute to 
the social agenda. CANADA supported the inclusion of global goals, 
but called for addressing deforestation separately from the issue 
of forest degradation. 

Vice-Chair Gauer adjourned the meeting in order to allow the G-
77/CHINA more time to consider the Chair's draft declaration.

IN THE CORRIDORS

Many have said that the G-77/CHINA has made progress in its 
initial reading of the draft text, noting agreement, at least in 
principle, to the idea of "strategic objectives" as opposed to 
"goals" or "targets." But, according to some, there remains 
considerable controversy within the G-77/CHINA over the 
desirability of a legally binding instrument and uncertainty as to 
what a voluntary code might entail.




This issue of the Earth Negotiations Bulletin (c) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is 
written and edited by Andrew Baldwin, Deborah Davenport, Ph.D., 
Radoslav Dimitrov, Ph.D., Reem Hajjar, and Peter Wood. The Digital 
Editor is Dan Birchall. The Editor is Pamela S. Chasek, Ph.D. 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and the Director of IISD Reporting Services is 
Langston James "Kimo" Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. The Sustaining 
Donors of the Bulletin are the Government of the United States of 
America (through the Department of State Bureau of Oceans and 
International Environmental and Scientific Affairs), the 
Government of Canada (through CIDA), the Swiss Agency for 
Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), the United Kingdom 
(through the Department for International Development - DFID), the 
Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Government of Germany 
(through the German Federal Ministry of Environment - BMU, and the 
German Federal Ministry of Development Cooperation - BMZ), the 
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the European Commission 
(DG-ENV), and the Italian Ministry of Environment. General Support 
for the Bulletin during 2005 is provided by the United Nations 
Environment Programme (UNEP), the Government of Australia, the 
Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment 
and Water Management, the Ministry of Sustainable Development and 
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, the Ministry of 
Environment and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway, the 
Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of 
Finland, Swan International, the Japanese Ministry of Environment 
(through the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies - IGES) 
and the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (through 
the Global Industrial and Social Progress Research Institute - 
GISPRI). Funding for translation of the Earth Negotiations 
Bulletin into French has been provided by the International 
Organization of the Francophonie (IOF) and the French Ministry of 
Foreign Affairs. Funding for the translation of the Earth 
Negotiations Bulletin into Spanish has been provided by the 
Ministry of Environment of Spain. The opinions expressed in the 
Earth Negotiations Bulletin are those of the authors and do not 
necessarily reflect the views of IISD or other donors. Excerpts 
from the Earth Negotiations Bulletin may be used in non-commercial 
publications with appropriate academic citation. For information 
on the Bulletin, including requests to provide reporting services, 
contact the Director of IISD Reporting Services at 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, +1-646-536-7556 or 212 East 47th St. #21F, 
New York, NY 10017, USA. The ENB Team at UNFF-5 can be contacted 
by e-mail at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

---
You are currently subscribed to enb as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subscribe to Linkages Update to receive our fortnightly, html-newsletter on 
what's new in the international environment and sustainable development arena: 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/subscribe.htm
- Archives of Climate-L and Climate-L News are available online at: 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/climate-L.htm
- Archives of Water-L and Water-L News are available online at: 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/water-L.htm

Reply via email to