ENB on the side  -  Twenty-second sessions of the Subsidiary 
Bodies of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change  -  Issue #2 

PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE 
DEVELOPMENT (IISD) in cooperation with UNFCCC

Written by:

Ingrid Barnsley 
Alice Bisiaux 
Maria Larsson Ortino 
Kati Kulovesi 

Editor:

Lisa Schipper, Ph.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Director of IISD Reporting Services:

Langston James "Kimo" Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Volume 16, Issue #2
Saturday, 21 May 2005

Online at http://www.iisd.ca/climate/sb22/

Events convened on Friday, 20 May 2005

Title: Post-Kyoto negotiations: African priorities

Presented by Kenya 

Calling for equity in the climate process, Grace Akumu, the New 
Partnership for Africa's Development (NEPAD-Kenya), stated that 
Africa is marginalized in the current climate regime, it will be 
worst hit by climate impacts, and with only two African countries 
currently hosting CDM projects, Africa is virtually excluded from 
the CDM. 

Timothy M'mella, Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources, 
Kenya, stated that the Kyoto Protocol will neither deliver to 
Africa, nor meaningfully reduce emissions. He called for an 
equitable and effective future regime that allows for 
cost-effective emissions reductions. He emphasized that Africa 
should actively engage in the regime's creation.

Joshua Wairoto, Kenya Meteorological Department, highlighted 
Africa's vulnerability to climate change. Noting that Africa 
contributes the least to climate change but will suffer the most, 
he stressed the need for adaptation. He identified climate impacts 
already experienced, including: threatened food security; 
increases in vector-borne diseases; economic loss from 
drought-induced difficulties with hydro-power; declining water 
levels in lakes, rivers and streams; melting mountain glaciers; 
floods; and landslides. He reminded participants that climate 
change is not only an environmental problem, but also an 
important economic and political concern. He indicated that 
without equity, Africa's development aspirations and the 
Millennium Development Goals cannot be achieved. Wairoto 
explained Africa's proposal on climate equity based on per 
capita emissions, and "contraction and convergence" during the 
Kyoto negotiations. He highlighted the need for emissions trading 
that allows Africa to participate equally and independently, and 
identified the need to involve the African Union and the 
sub-regional economic groupings in climate negotiations. He 
concluded that for Africa to survive, the future climate regime 
must be based on equity, the precautionary and polluter pays 
principles, and on common but differentiated responsibilities.

Discussion: Akumu indicated that this event aims at highlighting 
African priorities rather than presenting an "African position." 
She said the name of the post-2012 agreement is not as important 
as the incorporation of African concerns. Participants discussed 
the need to enhance public awareness of climate change and the CDM 
status in Africa. M'mella said the CDM is a good system, but 
stressed that methodologies must be simplified as they are too 
complicated for African entrepreneurs to develop bankable 
projects. He also highlighted the need for certainty on the 
post-2012 regime, and urged industrialised countries to reduce 
emissions and keep their financial promises.     

Contact:
Grace Akumu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Timothy M'mella <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Joshua Wairoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Title: Belgian JI/CDM tender open for proposals

Presented by Belgium 

Elisabeth Ellegaard, the Federal Public Service of Health, Food 
Chain Safety and Environment, Belgium, outlined her country's 
tender for Joint Implementation (JI) and CDM projects. She said 
the tender aims to purchase 12.3 million tons of emissions 
reductions for the 2008-2012 period. She explained that the tender 
opened on 13 May 2005 with a budget of 9.3 million euros. She 
indicated no preference for JI or CDM projects, and said all 
project types, apart from sink and nuclear energy projects, are 
eligible. She explained that priority is being given to energy 
efficiency, renewable and small-scale projects. She noted that the 
tender consists of two phases, highlighting that Belgium is 
planning to partially finance 25 candidates to prepare the 
necessary documents during the tender's second phase. Ellegaard 
indicated that up-front payments are possible for up to 50% of the 
contract value. She mentioned a workshop for potential candidates 
in June 2005, and a second workshop for selected candidates. 

Tine Heyse, the Federal Public Service of Health, Food Chain 
Safety and Environment, Belgium, outlined requirements for the 
second phase of the tender. She explained that the award criteria 
focus on certainty of delivery and sustainability, with equal 
weight given to both. Heyse anticipated that negotiations for 
Emissions Reduction Purchase Agreements would begin in May 2006.

Discussion: Participants focused on project eligibility, upfront 
payments, and the possible financial contribution toward the 
preparation of required documents.

More information:
http://www.klimaat.be/jicdmtender

Contact:
Elisabeth Ellegaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tine Heyse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 



Title: Energy efficiency: The biggest fuel

Presented by the International Energy Agency 

Paul Waide, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 
(OECD), presented an International Energy Agency (IEA) analysis of 
energy efficiency. He noted that despite an increase in energy 
supply since 1973, energy intensity has declined greatly, but that 
rates of energy savings have slowed significantly in the last 
decade. He explained that it is possible to decouple the increase 
in energy demand from economic growth and that labeling has been 
one of the most successful measures to reduce energy consumption. 
He concluded that potentials for improved energy efficiency exist 
but require stronger public policy efforts.

Waide also presented a study on energy efficiency in the 
refurbishment of high rise buildings. He said the study examined 
several energy saving measures, including improving the building 
fabric and heating system, and reducing the cooling demand. Waide 
stated that energy saving measures had been found cost effective 
and called for structural funds for housing in new EU members.

Alan Meier, OECD, presented on energy savings in set up boxes, a 
television device that will be increasingly needed by digital 
viewers. He explained that energy demand could increase if the 
stand-by consumption of the boxes is high. Meier indicated that 
several countries were already adopting regulations to ensure they 
were made energy efficient, by imposing a 1W stand-by consumption 
rate. 

Meier also presented a draft IEA survey of critics of energy 
efficiency, which aims to develop better energy efficiency 
policies. He analyzed nine recurrent criticisms and called for the 
development of policies to minimize them, especially those 
concerning the accuracy of the savings estimates.

Discussion: One participant from a developing country suggested 
OECD countries take the lead in disseminating good practices and 
policies in energy efficiency. Participants also addressed the 
updating of labeling standards and measures taken to reduce 
cooling demands.

More information:
http://www.iea.org

Contact:
Paul Waide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Alan Meier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Title: Preparing for implementation: Initial requirements under 
the Kyoto Protocol

Presented by the UNFCCC

Halldor Thorgeirsson, UNFCCC, said the focus of the event would be 
the parties' obligation to demonstrate progress in initial 
reporting under the Kyoto Protocol. He indicated that the Article 
8 review process involves: review of initial reports; periodic 
review of national communications; annual review of supplementary 
information under Article 7.1 and expedited review to reinstate 
the eligibility for mechanisms. 

Clare Breidenich, UNFCCC, highlighted that problems in the base 
year inventory detected by the Expert Review Team may reduce the 
assigned amounts. She emphasized that an accepted review year 
basis for assigned amounts is final and cannot be revised. She 
underscored that national inventory systems must be maintainable 
and reproducible. 

Andrew Howard, UNFCCC, highlighted the importance of national 
registries for demonstrable progress reporting. He indicated that 
parties' fulfillment of the eligibility requirements under the 
Kyoto mechanisms are based on the initial report and review. He 
stated that parties are automatically eligible to employ the 
mechanisms 16 months after the report has been submitted, but that 
the Enforcement Branch of the Compliance Committee may suspend the 
employment of the mechanisms and parties must meet the 
requirements in subsequent years.

Katia Simeonova, UNFCCC, specified that the Secretariat must be 
informed of reporting delays, and indicated that six-month delays 
will be reported to the COP/MOP and the Compliance Committee, and 
be made public. She indicated that the review reports will contain 
information such as: potential problems identified by the review 
team; the timeliness of submissions; and assessments of how to 
treat identified problems. 

Discussion: Participants raised concerns regarding: Article 3.3 
and 3.4 activities; activities of the Enforcement and Facilitative 
Branches of the Compliance Committee; training for expert review 
teams; and the Kyoto Protocol timeline and base year adjustments. 

More information:
http://www.unfccc.int

Contact:
Halldor Thorgeirsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Clare Breidenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andrew Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Katia Simeonova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Title: 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas 
Inventories

Presented by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 

Jim Penman, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 
stressed that the IPCC's greenhouse gas inventory guideline system 
has evolved and recognizes the work already done by parties. He 
said the new Guidelines aim to reduce the amount of cross 
referencing and promote consistency between sectors. He noted the 
IPCC's hope that the 2006 Guidelines will be as useful as those 
of 1996. 

Simon Eggleston, IPCC, summarized the innovations in the 2006 
Guidelines, including better coverage of: sources; gases; 
non-energy product uses of fossil fuels; carbon capture and 
storage; harvested wood products; and wetlands. He indicated 
the IPCC's desire to present the new Guidelines at SBSTA 24 in 
May 2006.

On real emissions estimates, William Agyemang-Bonsu, IPCC, 
highlighted changes including: clarification of the "reference 
approach" and "sectoral approach"; a new "Tier 1" approach for 
fluoride gases; and the use of a "first order decay model" for 
landfills. Presenting on the Agriculture, Forests and Other Land 
Use ("AFOLU") sectors, N.H. Ravindranath, IPCC, noted changed 
features such as: a new approach to inventories for land use and 
livestock systems; the inclusion of wetlands as a land use 
category; and the introduction of a common methodology for all 
AFOLU sectors.  

Jochen Harnisch, IPCC, presented on the merging of the "Industrial 
Process" and "Solvent and Other Product Use" sectors. He noted 
that the new sector accommodates more sources and gases, and 
clarifies and regroups the source categories.  Other changes 
include better differentiation within the chemical and metal 
industries, and greater coverage of "other product use" emissions. 

Discussion: Participants discussed methane emissions from 
wetlands; emissions from agricultural soils and from the 
substitution of fluorine gases; consistency between the new and 
old guidelines; the usability of the guidelines; and IPCC guidance 
on mitigation.

More information:
http://www.ipcc.ch
http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/

Contact:
Jim Penman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Simon Eggleston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
William Agyemang-Bonsu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
N.H. Ravindranath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jochen Harnisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Title: Future of the CDM

Presented by Japan

In introducing the Japanese initiative on the future of the CDM, 
Hiroshi Yamagata, Japanese Department of Economy, Trade and 
Industry, expressed hope that it will contribute to sustainable 
development. Taishi Sugiyama, Central Institute of Electric Power 
Industry, presented the outcomes of a workshop held in Tokyo in 
March 2005, noting the focus on methodology development for energy 
efficiency projects.

Axel Michaelowa, Hamburg Institute of International Economics, 
proposed future work on baseline methodologies for energy 
efficiency projects, including addressing "rebound effects", and 
considering standard payback periods and efficiency benchmarks in 
additionality tests. In discussing "common or consolidated" 
baselines for expediting methodologies for energy efficiency 
projects, Jayant Sathaye, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 
concluded that: the bundling of projects can reduce transaction 
costs and the consolidation of methodologies may lead to faster 
project approval. Kenichiro Yamaguchi, Mitsubishi Research 
Institute, focused on mass transport projects, noting that 
methodologies may be complex, and project effectiveness may be 
under-evaluated.

Lex de Jonge, Dutch Ministry of Housing, Spatial Planning and the 
Environment, indicated support for the Japanese initiative, 
expressed doubt about the timing of consolidating methodologies, 
and suggested the initiative focus on improving the efficiency of 
the CDM EB and the CDM post-2012. Marcela Main, Department of 
International Affairs, Chile, stressed the importance of: adapting 
consolidated methodologies to local circumstances; policy and 
programme-based methodologies; and methodology and project 
development in the transportation sector. Johans Heiseter, World 
Bank Prototype Carbon Fund, suggested that the Japanese CDM 
initiative should be flexible, involve project developers, seek 
interaction with the EB and the Secretariat, and consider the 
creation of an Advisory Group with EB representation. Juan Carlos 
Caycedo, Andean Center for Economics in the Environment, 
emphasized the need to consider project "rebound effects" and 
questioned whether the Japanese initiative could join forces with 
project developers, rather than solely deliver general 
methodologies. 

More information:
http://www.meti.go.jp
http://criepi.denken.or.jp
http://www.hwwa.de/climate.htm
http://ies.lbl.gov/
http://www.mri.co.jp
http://www.vrom.nl
http://www.conama.cl
http://www.carbonfinance.org
http://www.andeancenter.com

Contact:
Hiroshi Yamagata <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Taishi Sugiyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Axel Michaelowa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Jayant Sathaye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lex de Jonge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Marcela Main <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Johannes Heister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Juan Carlos Caycedo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 



The Earth Negotiations Bulletin on the side (ENBOTS) (c) 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is a special publication of the International 
Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) in cooperation with 
the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) 
Secretariat. This issue has been written by Ingrid Barnsley, Alice 
Bisiaux, Maria Larsson Ortino, and Kati Kulovesi. The photographer 
is Leila Mead. The Digital Editor is Diego Noguera. The Editor is 
Lisa Schipper, Ph.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. The Director of IISD 
Reporting Services is Langston James "Kimo" Goree VI 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Funding for the publication of ENBOTS at UNFCCC 
SB-22 is provided by the UNFCCC Secretariat. The opinions 
expressed in ENBOTS are those of the authors and do not 
necessarily reflect the views of IISD and funders. Excerpts from 
ENBOTS may be used in non-commercial publications only with 
appropriate academic citation. For permission to use this material 
in commercial publications, contact the Director of IISD Reporting 
Services at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Electronic versions of issues of 
ENBOTS from SB-22 can be found on the Linkages website at 
http://www.iisd.ca/climate/sb22/. The ENBOTS Team at SB-22 can be 
contacted by e-mail at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

---
You are currently subscribed to enb as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subscribe to Linkages Update to receive our fortnightly, html-newsletter on 
what's new in the international environment and sustainable development arena: 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/subscribe.htm
- Archives of Climate-L and Climate-L News are available online at: 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/climate-L.htm
- Archives of Water-L and Water-L News are available online at: 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/water-L.htm

Reply via email to