ENB on the side  -  Twenty-second sessions of the Subsidiary 
Bodies of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change  -  Issue #4 

PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE 
DEVELOPMENT (IISD) in cooperation with UNFCCC

Written by:

Ingrid Barnsley 
Alice Bisiaux 
Maria Larsson Ortino 
Kati Kulovesi 

Editor:

Lisa Schipper, Ph.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Director of IISD Reporting Services:

Langston James "Kimo" Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Volume 16, Issue #4
Tuesday, 24 May 2005

Online at http://www.iisd.ca/climate/sb22/

Events convened on Monday, 23 May 2005

Title: European Capacity Building Initiative launch

Presented by the International Institute for Environment and 
Development   

Benito M�ller, Oxford Climate Policy, presented on the European 
Capacity Building Initiative (ECBI), which aims at supporting 
delegates and other stakeholders from targeted developing 
countries to enhance their capacity to participate effectively in 
climate change negotiations and to generate trust by bringing 
together developing country stakeholders and their European 
counterparts. He explained that the ECBI comprises a fellowship, a 
workshop, and a policy analysis programme. He said the goal of the 
fellowship programme is to build south-south and north-south trust 
and facilitate institutional and procedural knowledge exchange. He 
explained that the workshop programme's objective is to enhance 
the negotiating skills of individuals and groups of delegates and 
that the policy analysis programme aims at building analytic 
capacity. He described the management structure of the ECBI, and 
indicated that its pilot phase started in April 2005 and will be 
followed by a 2006-2007 phase to prove the validity of the ECBI 
concept.

Saleemul Huq, International Institute for Environment and 
Development, expanded on the workshop programme of the ECBI, which 
consists of negotiation workshops at the COPs as well as 
intersessional workshops for the South-Asian and Sub-Saharan 
regions. He stated that the workshops aim at enhancing the 
negotiating capacity of delegates from Least Developed Countries 
(LDCs) and helping LDCs to function as an effective negotiating 
group. He reported on the first two workshops held at COP 9 and 
COP 10 and detailed intended follow-up activities, including: 
mentoring for junior LDC negotiators; keeping a roster of LDC 
delegates; and enhancing information exchange through the ECBI 
website.

Christoph B�hringer, Centre for European Economic Research, said 
the goal of the core policy analysis programme is to enhance 
negotiators' understanding of modeling issues. He explained that 
the project will comprise a core seminar with modeling experts to 
present on the strengths and weaknesses of various approaches, and 
the development of a model inventory and database. He added that 
the full policy analysis programme will include a capacity 
building project on technical modeling through in-depth training 
and workshops in selected fields.

Discussion: Participants underscored the need to build the 
capacity of LDCs to identify where their interests lie and how to 
negotiate as a group. M�ller stressed that the ECBI is demand-
driven and intends to raise the awareness of delegates from 
developing countries on the availability of alternative 
approaches. Other issues discussed included the role of models in 
the post-Kyoto regime, the ECBI budget, and the allocation within 
its three programmes.

More information:
http://www.oxfordclimatepolicy.org
http://www.zew.de
http://www.eurocapacity.org

Contacts:
Benito M�ller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Saleemul Huq <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Christoph B�hringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bo Kjell�n <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Title: Making the UNFCCC climate neutral  

Presented by the UNFCCC 

John Henssen, UNFCCC, specified that the aim of the "climate 
neutral initiative" is to neutralize greenhouse gas emissions 
associated with conducting COP and SB meetings through climate 
change mitigation measures elsewhere. He stated that in order to 
further this initiative, the Secretariat has published a document 
(FCCC/SBI/2005/9) to seek parties' views and guidance. He 
specified that the initiative's guiding principle is simplicity 
and that its focus is to induce behavioral change. He indicated 
that it is necessary to ascertain how much carbon dioxide is 
associated with meetings, offset these, and communicate the 
results. He highlighted that as the estimation tool has been 
developed minimal resources are now needed.

Florin Vladu, UNFCCC, indicated that potential options for 
offsetting emissions could be: purchasing emissions credits from 
climate projects, a carbon fund or an emission trading scheme; or 
creating stand-alone CDM or other projects. He indicated that the 
preference seems to be for projects in developing countries. 

Bill Sneyd, Future Forests, outlined the work of his organization 
for WSSD and COP 9 and said the critical issue is the programme 
design of the "climate neutral initiative". He highlighted the 
importance of establishing emissions assessments, selecting offset 
projects, and communicating with participants. He emphasized the 
need for a single coordinating entity to simplify decision-making. 
He suggested that the Secretariat outsource the initiative and 
involve parties, observers, and other stakeholders.
 
Discussion: Participants questioned the double counting of credits 
from CDM projects under the initiative and the use of the CDM Gold 
Standard, and said projects should be instituted in developing 
countries. Several participants underscored that the scheme must 
be voluntary, rather than imposed by the Secretariat. 

More information:
http://www.unfccc.int
http://www.futureforests.com

Contact:
John Henssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Florin Vladu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bill Sneyd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Title: A global climate community: Heads in the sand or willing to 
lead?

Presented by Action for a Global Climate Community 

Peter Luff, Action for a Global Climate Community (AGCC), and 
David Grace, AGCC, chaired a roundtable discussion on AGCC's 
campaign for a new initiative to unite developed and developing 
countries in reducing carbon emissions "farther and faster" than 
existing Kyoto obligations. Luff said the AGCC proposes this 
commitment be based on the principle of "contraction and 
convergence" - the contraction of greenhouse gas emissions to a 
safe internationally agreed scientific level and convergence to 
equal emission rights for all. 

Discussion: Participants considered the meaning of equity, and 
"contraction and convergence." They discussed ways to harness 
momentum for future action on climate change, including through 
education and civil society support. Several participants noted 
that government action will be fostered if governments understand 
that failure to take action will cost more than mitigating climate 
change. 

On providing incentives for industry, one participant noted that 
incentives are not only financial but that rule-based certainty 
may also act as an incentive. Another participant emphasized the 
potential for Africa to utilize hydrogen and solar energy, while 
others outlined current barriers to the use of such resources in 
Africa.

Most participants considered an institutional framework to be key 
to any future commitment on climate change. Luff and Grace raised 
the idea of a "bubble" of willing countries negotiating inside the 
existing UNFCCC. One participant suggested the AGCC should: invite 
discussion on the requirements of equity and "contraction and 
convergence"; encourage civil society to view climate change as an 
equity issue; and invite critique of post-Kyoto proposals that are 
not based on equity principles. 

More information:
http://www.climatecommunity.org

Contact:
Peter Luff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
David Grace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 



Title: Recent analysis from the Annex I expert group

Presented by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and 
Development

Jane Ellis, OECD, outlined: institutional developments; proposed 
CDM projects and their status; and funding for CDM/JI. She 
indicated the wide but uneven geographical spread of projects and 
stated that funding availability has improved significantly.

Martina Bosi, International Energy Agency (IEA), explained that 
the study "Exploring Options for Sectoral Crediting Mechanisms" 
(SCMs) focuses on three options: sectoral policies; rate-based 
sectoral baselines; and fixed sectoral limits. She said all SCMs 
need baselines and reliable data. She stated that the extent of 
environmental benefits will depend on the design of the mechanism. 

C�dric Philibert, IEA, outlined future international cooperation 
on emissions reductions including quantitative and non-
quantitative approaches, indicating that they could involve: fixed 
binding targets; dynamic binding targets with price caps; 
technology agreements; and carbon taxes. In considering 
international energy technology collaboration, he highlighted 
clean coal technologies in China where technology transfer has 
occurred through, inter alia, patent acquisitions and the 
involvement of development banks. 

Debra Justus, OECD, in outlining the integration of wind power 
into electricity systems, discussed no-cost supply uncertainties 
and quick set-up. She said wind electricity generation has grown 
where research and development have been coupled with supporting 
policies, and where "push and pull" technologies have been 
employed for supply and manufacturing. She highlighted lessons 
learned, including that market-changing policies must engage 
stakeholders throughout the commercialization chain, and that 
technology development forms a continuum from research to 
development. 

Discussion: Participants asked questions related to the difficulty 
of taking a sectoral approach to emissions reductions, the 
political feasibility of SCMs, broadening the scope of the CDM, 
and the need to provide challenges and incentives for the industry 
to reduce emissions.

More information:
http://www.oecd.org/env
http://www.oecd.org/env/cc
http://www.iea.org

Contact:
Jane Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Martina Bosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
C�dric Philibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debra Justus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 



Title: Beyond Kyoto 2012: A structural evolution of the Kyoto 
Protocol by a global emission trading scheme

Presented by Germany

Highlighting the need to think beyond Kyoto, Gerhard Spilok, 
Ministry for the Environment of the State of Baaden-W�rttemberg, 
Germany, noted the Global Climate Certificate System (GCCS) as a 
possible alternative.  

Hans-Jochen Luhmann, Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment 
and Energy, underscored the urgent challenge of cutting emissions 
by 2050 and indicated that global emissions are estimated to 
increase by 50% by the end of the Kyoto period due to emissions 
from developing countries and the US.

J�rg D�rr-Pucher, German Environmental Aid, said the Kyoto 
Protocol's merits include incentives to save energy and develop 
cleaner technologies. He identified the need for: a global 
quantified climate sustainability target; the integration of 
developing countries and the US; and a globally effective economic 
incentive for companies and governments to reduce emissions.
Lutz Wicke, European School of Management, stated that the 550 ppm 
concentration level requires the GCCS to cap global annual 
emissions to 30 billion tons from 2013 onwards. He said the GCCS 
is based on immediate equal per capita distribution allocated to 
national governments under strict rules. He said the allocation 
corresponds to the estimated emissions in 2015 but that it 
necessitates corrections to avoid destroying industrialized 
countries' economies. 

Christoph B�hringer, Centre for European Economic Research, noted 
that an integrated assessment of long-term emissions abatement 
strategies shows that the GCCS is economically efficient, and 
leads to lower carbon concentrations than other scenarios and to 
an approximate temperature rise of 2.6C. 

Discussion: Participants discussed adaptation needs and the 
distribution of benefits from the GCCS among developing countries. 
They noted that the EU's 2C target would require a lower cap than 
the current GCCS proposal. 

More information:
http://www.um.baden-wuttemberg.de

Contact:
Gerhard Spilok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hans-Jochen Luhmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
J�rg D�rr-Pucher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lutz Wicke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Christoph B�hringer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



Title: CC: Forum 

Presented by the UNFCCC

June Budhooram, UNFCCC, said the Consultative Group of Experts on 
National Communications from non-Annex I parties (CGE) is 
essential for supporting these parties in preparing their national 
communications. Emily Ojoo-Massawa, CGE, explained that the CGE 
aims to identify technical problems and assist non-Annex I parties 
in preparing national communications.

Summarizing the work of the CGE's thematic group on vulnerability 
and adaptation, Arthur Rolle, CGE, suggested that based on the 
success of an April 2005 workshop in Mozambique, more training 
workshops should be held. On the provisional findings of the 
thematic group on greenhouse gas inventories, Taka Hiraishi, CGE, 
said all non-Annex I parties used the Revised 1996 IPCC Guidelines 
in their first national communications, and many covered a wide 
range of gases but reported difficulties in obtaining national 
activity data.

Presenting on behalf of the mitigation group of the CGE and Jaekyu 
Lim, CGE, Festus Luboyera, UNFCCC, noted that: the scope of 
mitigation reports in national communications varies; technical 
support and adequate data are essential for mitigation analysis; 
and the "time horizon" for mitigation assessments should be 
standardized. Luis Paz Castro, CGE, said the cross-cutting issues 
thematic group of the CGE plans to prepare a template to assist 
countries in reporting on such issues, and that many parties 
consider Article 6 activities on education and training to be 
important.

Martha Perdomo, UNDP/UNEP National Communications Support 
Programme (NCSP), said the NCSP would: promote feedback with 
regional partners; identify needs through monitoring and direct 
feedback; and work with the CGE on technical assistance 
activities.

Discussion: Participants asked questions on: widening the scope of 
training workshops; choosing a baseline year for non-Annex I 
national communications; using the IPCC inventories software; and 
standardizing "time horizons." One participant suggested the NCSP 
should work with regional centers to provide technical assistance.

More information:
http://unfccc.int/national_reports/non-annex_i_natcom/cge/items/ 
2608.php
http://regserver.unfccc.int/seors/reports/events_list.html

Contact:
June Budhooram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Emily Ojoo-Massawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Arthur Rolle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Taka Hiraishi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Luis Paz Castro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Jaekyu Lim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Martha Perdomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 




The Earth Negotiations Bulletin on the side (ENBOTS) � 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is a special publication of the International 
Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) in cooperation with 
the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) 
Secretariat. This issue has been written by Ingrid Barnsley, Alice 
Bisiaux, Maria Larsson Ortino, and Kati Kulovesi. The photographer 
is Leila Mead. The Digital Editor is Diego Noguera. The Editor is 
Lisa Schipper, Ph.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. The Director of IISD 
Reporting Services is Langston James "Kimo" Goree VI 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Funding for the publication of ENBOTS at UNFCCC 
SB 22 is provided by the UNFCCC Secretariat. The opinions 
expressed in ENBOTS are those of the authors and do not 
necessarily reflect the views of IISD and funders. Excerpts from 
ENBOTS may be used in non-commercial publications only with 
appropriate academic citation. For permission to use this material 
in commercial publications, contact the Director of IISD Reporting 
Services at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Electronic versions of issues of 
ENBOTS from SB 22 can be found on the Linkages website at 
http://www.iisd.ca/climate/sb22/. The ENBOTS Team at SB 22 can be 
contacted by e-mail at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

---
You are currently subscribed to enb as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subscribe to Linkages Update to receive our fortnightly, html-newsletter on 
what's new in the international environment and sustainable development arena: 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/subscribe.htm
- Archives of Climate-L and Climate-L News are available online at: 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/climate-L.htm
- Archives of Water-L and Water-L News are available online at: 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/water-L.htm

Reply via email to