8th Conference of the Parties to the Convention on the Conservation 
of Migratory Species of Wild Animals  -  Issue #5 

EARTH NEGOTIATIONS BULLETIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR 
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (IISD) <http://www.iisd.org>

Written and edited by:

Karen Alvarenga de Oliveira, Ph.D. 
Nienke Beintema 
Leonie Gordon 
Elisa Morgera 

Editor:

Pamela S. Chasek, Ph.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Director of IISD Reporting Services:

Langston James "Kimo" Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


Vol. 18 No. 26
Friday, 25 November 2005

Online at http://www.iisd.ca/cms/cop8/ 

CMS COP-8 HIGHLIGHTS:

THURSDAY, 24 NOVEMBER 2005 

On Thursday, 24 November, delegates to the eighth Conference of 
the Parties (COP-8) to the Convention on Migratory Species (CMS) 
met in plenary in the morning and afternoon, to address 
fundraising, secretariat staff, the 2010 target, and institutional 
issues. The plenary also adopted amendments to the Convention 
Appendices and several resolutions and recommendations. The 
Committee of the Whole (COW) convened in the morning and 
afternoon, endorsing resolutions on the information management 
system and national reports, and considering crosscutting issues, 
development of future agreements and outstanding resolutions and 
recommendations. The avian influenza working group met in the 
afternoon, and the budget working group met throughout the day and 
into the night.

PLENARY

In the morning, the COP admitted one NGO as observer. In the 
afternoon, Credentials Committee Chair El Mastour Abdellah 
reported that, of the countries present, 62 have had their 
credentials accepted, six have just submitted their credentials 
for approval, and 13 have not submitted them yet.

SIGNING OF MOUs: The Plenary witnessed the signing of the: African 
Marine Turtles MOU by Liberia, IOSEA Marine Turtles MOU by 
Eritrea, and the Aquatic Warbler MOU by Belgium. 

FUNDRAISING: The COP endorsed the private sector fundraising 
project (UNEP/CMS/Conf.8.20) and the CMS fundraising strategy 
(UNEP/CMS/Inf.8.17).

SECRETARIAT MANPOWER AND ORGANIZATION: CMS Deputy Executive 
Secretary Douglas Hykle introduced the Secretariat’s organization 
and staff requirements (UNEP/CMS/Conf.8.17), urging agreement on 
Budget Scenario Three being discussed in the budget working group, 
and on appointing two additional personnel. CMS Executive 
Secretary Robert Hepworth commended delegates’ cooperative work to 
address the Convention’s difficult financial situation. Stressing 
financial constraints that affect CMS project work, he said 
overall results were encouraging, and welcomed the new resolutions 
and projects on, inter alia, grassland birds and by-catch. He 
appealed to parties to make voluntary contributions to additional 
projects and to ensure that priority projects are provided for in 
the budget. On manpower, he reported that Australia had expressed 
interest in co-funding an officer at the Marine Turtle IOSEA MOU 
regional office in Bangkok, Thailand, to work on CMS issues 
pertaining to the region, with the Secretariat being requested to 
provide additional funding, preferably through a budget increase. 
The EU expressed concern with establishing any additional posts. 
Chair Patrick Van Klaveren suggested continuing consideration of 
this item upon conclusion of the budget discussions.

2010 TARGET: Regarding the resolution on CMS and the 2010 target 
(UNEP/CMS/Res.8.7/Rev.1), the EU highlighted proposed amendments 
on taking action within the framework of the strategic plan. The 
Secretariat proposed an alternative title for the resolution, 
namely “Assessing the contribution of CMS in achieving the 2010 
biodiversity target.” 

INSTITUTIONAL ISSUES: Election of the Standing Committee: COP-8 
appointed to the Standing Committee for 2006-2008: Saudi Arabia, 
with Pakistan as alternate, for Asia; the UK, with Monaco as 
alternate, for Western Europe; Ukraine, with Hungary as alternate, 
for Central and Eastern Europe; and Australia, with New Zealand as 
alternate, for Oceania. The Africa and Americas groups will 
present their nominations at a later date. 

Election of Scientific Councillors: Scientific Council Chair Colin 
Galbraith reported on progress in appointing councillors for the 
2006-2008 Council. He highlighted the election of Roseline Beudels 
and Taej Mundkur as new councillors for Mammals and Asia 
respectively, and the creation of three new councillor positions 
for Fish, By-catch and Africa.

ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO APPENDICES: COP-8 adopted the proposals 
for amendments to CMS Appendices I and II as endorsed by COW, with 
reservations on the Basking shark being tabled by NEW ZEALAND, 
DENMARK on behalf of the Faroe Islands, the EU, PORTUGAL and NORWAY. 

On a suggestion by the Scientific Council Chair Galbraith to list 
the Gorilla on Appendix II, NORWAY raised a point of procedure on 
the introduction of a new listing proposal during the COP. Chair 
van Klaveren and Galbraith referred to the desire to enhance 
progress of a regional agreement on the Gorilla through Appendix 
II listing, although Galbraith highlighted the need for scientific 
analysis. The Secretariat suggested a precedent may exist for a 
listing proposal being presented during the COP, but also said 
that a lack of Appendix II listing should not hinder the 
development of a regional agreement. 

ADOPTION OF RESOLUTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Sustainable Use 
Working Group Co-Chair Ronel Nel introduced a revised resolution 
(UNEP/CMS/Res.8.1/Rev.1), which the COP adopted without amendment. 
The plenary also adopted resolutions on: outreach and communication 
(UNEP/CMS/Res.8.8); the Information Management System (IMS) 
(UNEP/CMS/Res.8.10/Rev.2); cooperation with other conventions 
(UNEP/CMS/Res.8.11); integration of migratory species into national 
biodiversity strategies and action plans and CBD work programmes 
(UNEP/CMS/Res.8.18/Rev.1); national reports (UNEP/CMS/Res.8.24); 
and concerted action on Appendix I species 
(UNEP/CMS/Res.8.29/Rev.1). Adoption of the resolution on the 
review of the Global Registry of Migratory Species (GROMS) 
(UNEP/CMS/Res.8.9) was postponed. The plenary further adopted 
recommendations on raptors and owls in the African-Eurasian region 
(UNEP/CMS/Rec.8.12/Rev.1) and Central Eurasian aridland mammals 
(UNEP/CMS/Rec.8.23). Delegates also adopted the recommendation on 
cooperative actions for Appendix II species 
(UNEP/CMS/Rec.8.28/Rev.1), which no longer lists the Whale shark 
among species designated for cooperative actions during 2006-2008. 
The Secretariat explained, following enquiries from the 
PHILIPPINES and KENYA, that the development of an agreement on the 
Whale shark is ongoing, and only species for which the conclusion 
of an agreement is not foreseen in the next triennium are included 
in the cooperative actions list. 

DATE AND VENUE OF COP-9: Reminding COP that no offer to host the 
next COP has yet been received, CMS Executive Secretary Hepworth 
encouraged interested parties to present their offer by the end of 
2006. He emphasized the need for financial support for developing 
countries to attend.

COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE

CROSSCUTTING ISSUES: Avian Influenza Working Group Co-Chair 
Reinhold Schnidrig reported on minor amendments to the draft 
resolution on avian influenza (UNEP/CMS/Res.27/Rev.1), and noted 
that the group will reconvene to finalize the draft later in the 
day. AUSTRALIA reported on progress regarding the by-catch draft 
resolution, noting that consultations are ongoing. GERMANY said a 
draft resolution on adverse human-induced impacts on cetaceans 
(UNEP/CMS/Res.8.22) was amended to refer to the UNEP Regional Seas 
Programme rather than to the Barcelona Convention for the 
Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution. On the 
draft resolution on climate change (UNEP/CMS/Res.8.13.Rev.1), the 
EU reported on ongoing discussions on a possible reference to 
UNFCCC in the preamble or operative text. 

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: The Secretariat introduced a 
revised resolution on IMS (UNEP/CMS/Res.8.10/Rev.2), amended to 
invite the Secretariat to explore synergies and linkages between 
IMS, GROMS and the UNEP GEO Data Portal. COW endorsed the revised 
resolution.

NATIONAL REPORTS: The Secretariat introduced a resolution on 
national reports (UNEP/CMS/Res.8.24), highlighting language on 
instructing the Secretariat to make available to parties, the 
Standing Committee and the Scientific Council an analysis of 
national reports by March 2006. He also urged parties to submit 
their reports at least six months before COPs. COW endorsed the 
resolution.

DEVELOPMENT OF FUTURE AGREEMENTS: Migratory sharks: AUSTRALIA 
reported on minor amendments to the draft resolution on migratory 
sharks (UNEP/CMS/Res.8.16/Rev.2). Delegates decided against a 
suggestion by the PHILIPPINES to include reference to existing 
recommendations, notably the one on the Whale shark, as this 
species is already addressed in the consolidated resolution on 
future agreements. 

Grassland birds: The Secretariat introduced a draft recommendation 
on the conservation of grassland birds and their habitats in 
Southern South America (UNEP/CMS/Rec.8.26). He proposed an 
amendment to reflect the interest shown by Argentina, Paraguay, 
Uruguay, Bolivia and Brazil, and text encouraging range states, 
parties and non-parties to CMS, to initiate an MOU.

OUTSTANDING RESOLUTIONS: In the afternoon, COW endorsed revised 
resolutions on migratory sharks (UNEP/CMS/Res.8.16/Rev.2) and 
grassland birds (UNEP/CMS/Res.8.26). Delegates also discussed 
minor amendments to the resolution on by-catch. On the resolution 
against adverse human-induced impacts on cetaceans, NORWAY noted 
the deletion from the last draft of an annex containing a list of 
measures against adverse human-induced impacts on cetaceans. 
GERMANY proposed transmitting the annex as a non-paper to the 
Scientific Council. ARGENTINA called for keeping a reference to 
the International Whaling Commission (IWC), in light of the IWC 
specialized mandate on the conservation and management of whale 
populations. MONACO stressed the limited objectives of the IWC 
mandate concerning the conservation of whales, and its limited 
membership. AUSTRALIA supported a balanced approach to the 
competencies of IWC and CMS.

BUDGET WORKING GROUP

In the morning, Budget Working Group Chair Véronique Hessenschmidt 
tabled a revised budget reflecting Wednesday’s discussion. 
Delegates debated on: the budget grand total; how to allocate 
funds derived from the saving measures agreed upon on Wednesday; 
and options for distributing such savings among projects, 
fundraising and delegates’ transport costs. Many delegates noted 
that more resources should be allocated to delivery of 
conservation projects and publications. Participants agreed on the 
amount to finance “outreach and fundraising” activities. Some 
delegates highlighted the potential savings that could be derived 
from negotiations between CMS and UNEP.

In the afternoon, Chair Hessenschmidt presented an updated version 
of the 2006-2008 budget, and delegates agreed to a grand total of 
US$7,526,698 to be shared among parties. Delegates then discussed, 
paragraph-by-paragraph, the operative text of the resolution on 
the financial and administrative matters of the CMS Trust Fund 
(UNEP/CMS/Res.8.3/Rev.1). The working group agreed that all 
contributions to the Trust Fund will be paid in Euros, on the 
basis of the exchange rate for the US dollar on 24 November 2005. 
Delegates requested the Secretariat to present the value of the 
total budget and the value of parties’ core contributions in 
Euros. The working group also agreed to establish a new trust fund 
for voluntary contributions, and decided against charging non-
parties any registration fee. In the evening, delegates finalized 
the revised resolution (UNEP/CMS/Res.8.3/Rev.2).

AVIAN INFLUENZA WORKING GROUP 

The working group on avian influenza, co-chaired by Reinhard 
Schnidrig and Ward Hagemeijer, agreed to remove from the revised 
draft resolution reference to specific examples of large-scale 
monitoring and surveillance programmes, and add reference in the 
resolution to an annex listing key research needs, including 
mapping migratory routes and clarifying the virus’ behavior and 
survival.

IN THE CORRIDORS

On Thursday afternoon, the week’s sleepless nights for delegates 
and the Secretariat finally paid dividends as the budget working 
group completed its task. Participants were in high spirits after 
reaching consensus on the total figure for the next triennium and 
agreeing on the budget currency migrating to the Euro. For some, 
this suggests that CMS’s “budget philosophy” is fuelling this 
small but ambitious conservation convention towards 2010. 

As participants celebrated, some continued pondering the last-
minute proposal for listing the Gorilla in Appendix II. One 
delegate even suggested that debate on procedural and substantive 
issues attached to this proposal may set an interesting tone for 
the final day of COP-8.

ENB SUMMARY AND ANALYSIS: The Earth Negotiations Bulletin summary 
and analysis of CMS COP-8 will be available on Monday, 28 November 
2005 at http://www.iisd.ca/cms/cop8/.




This issue of the Earth Negotiations Bulletin © <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> is 
written and edited by Karen Alvarenga de Oliveira, Ph.D., Nienke 
Beintema, Leonie Gordon, and Elisa Morgera. The Digital Editor is 
Dan Birchall. The Editor is Pamela S. Chasek, Ph.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
and the Director of IISD Reporting Services is Langston James 
“Kimo” Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. The Sustaining Donors of the 
Bulletin are the Government of the United States of America 
(through the Department of State Bureau of Oceans and 
International Environmental and Scientific Affairs), the 
Government of Canada (through CIDA), the Swiss Agency for 
Environment, Forests and Landscape (SAEFL), the United Kingdom 
(through the Department for International Development - DFID), the 
Danish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Government of Germany 
(through the German Federal Ministry of Environment - BMU, and the 
German Federal Ministry of Development Cooperation - BMZ), the 
Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the European Commission 
(DG-ENV), and the Italian Ministry of Environment. General Support 
for the Bulletin during 2005 is provided by the United Nations 
Environment Programme (UNEP), the Government of Australia, the 
Austrian Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment 
and Water Management, the Ministry of Sustainable Development and 
the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Sweden, the Ministry of 
Environment and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Norway, the 
Ministry of Environment and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of 
Finland, SWAN International, the Japanese Ministry of Environment 
(through the Institute for Global Environmental Strategies - IGES) 
and the Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (through 
the Global Industrial and Social Progress Research Institute - 
GISPRI). Funding for translation of the Earth Negotiations 
Bulletin into French has been provided by the International 
Organization of the Francophonie (IOF) and the French Ministry of 
Foreign Affairs. Funding for the translation of the Earth 
Negotiations Bulletin into Spanish has been provided by the 
Ministry of Environment of Spain. The opinions expressed in the 
Earth Negotiations Bulletin are those of the authors and do not 
necessarily reflect the views of IISD or other donors. Excerpts 
from the Earth Negotiations Bulletin may be used in non-commercial 
publications with appropriate academic citation. For information 
on the Bulletin, including requests to provide reporting services, 
contact the Director of IISD Reporting Services at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
+1-646-536-7556 or 212 East 47th St. #21F, New York, NY 10017, USA. 
The ENB Team at CMS COP-8 can be contacted at the Press Room 
("Fishbowl") on the first floor of the Conference area in Gigiri, 
UNON, or by e-mail at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

---
You are currently subscribed to $subst('List.Name') as: $subst('emailaddr')
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.UnSub')
- Subscribe to IISD Reporting Services' free newsletters and lists for 
environment and sustainable development policy professionals at 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/subscribe.htm

Reply via email to