4th World Water Forum – Issue #4 

WORLD WATER FORUM BULLETIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PUBLISHED BY THE INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE
DEVELOPMENT (IISD) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Written and edited by:

Nienke Beintema 
Robynne Boyd
Xenya Cherny
Alexandra Conliffe
Bo-Alex Fredvik
María Gutiérrez
Hugh Wilkins 

Editor:

Alexis Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 

Director of IISD Reporting Services:

Langston James "Kimo" Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
 

Volume 82, Number 12
Monday, 20 March 2006

Online at: http://www.iisd.ca/ymb/worldwater4/ 

4TH WORLD WATER FORUM HIGHLIGHTS:

SUNDAY, 19 MARCH 2006

On Sunday, 4th World Water Forum participants addressed the Forum 
framework theme of “Water Supply and Sanitation for All,” 
convening in plenary and thematic sessions. Africa took center 
stage on this fourth day of the Forum, as the continent’s water 
challenges were addressed in the regional presentation and various 
thematic sessions, and its vibrant culture presented in traditional 
performances held throughout the venue.

REGIONAL PRESENTATION

Francis Bougaïré, Burkina Faso’s Ministry of Agriculture, 
Hydraulics and Fisheries, opened and moderated the Africa regional 
presentation. Maria Mutagamba, Uganda’s Minister of State for 
Water and President of the African Ministerial Conference on Water 
(AMCOW), stated that the objectives of the presentation are to 
review recent progress in water management, focus global attention 
on Africa and mobilize global support. She emphasized that while 
Africa appreciates aid, trade has more potential to reduce poverty.

Loïc Fauchon, President of the World Water Council (WWC), 
acknowledged the positive work conducted by African organizations 
including AMCOW and the African Water Facility, highlighted the 
importance of technology, and called for the creation of an 
emergency task force to ensure appropriate aid delivery.

Cristóbal Jaime Jáquez, Co-Chair of the 4th World Water Forum and 
Director General of the Mexican National Water Commission 
(CONAGUA), noted that water problems faced by Africa are shared by 
other regions, in particular those concerning rural water access, 
and hoped that the 4th Forum would generate support needed to 
bring water solutions to the continent. 

Kordjé Bedourma, Director of the African Water Facility, presented 
the Africa regional report, noting that 300 million Africans 
currently lack access to basic water and sanitation. He said the 
report’s key message is that Africa must build water 
infrastructure, including large dams, in order to achieve the 
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), sustainable development and 
growth. He also prioritized action on water governance and 
transboundary water management, and urged the international 
community to enhance its support to the continent. 

José Dioné, UN Economic Commission for Africa, presented an 
advance copy of the Africa regional report to Mutagamba, 
highlighting that the processes that countries underwent in 
contributing to the report should be mainstreamed into national 
policy-making procedures. 

Outman Djame, Minister of Water and Fisheries of Chad, read out 
the African Ministerial Declaration to the 4th Forum, which calls, 
inter alia, for improving: development of water resources through 
infrastructure, environmental protection, transboundary water 
management, integrated water resources management (IWRM), and 
early warning systems for natural disasters. The Declaration also 
emphasizes: increased investments and stakeholder involvement; 
adequate governance and policy networks; capacity building; 
eradication of water-borne diseases; and making sanitation a top 
priority. 

Discussing the challenge of urbanization and water resources 
development in Africa, Anna Tibaijuka, Executive Director, 
UN-HABITAT, said water is a key indicator of how society manages 
environment and development, as well as an indicator of social 
justice and sustainability. She reiterated that without clean 
water, health and development targets will not be achieved, 
stressed the need to address urban water issues, and announced the 
signing of a Memorandum of Understanding with the African 
Development Bank for the release of approximately US$ 550 million 
for meeting the MDG water target in Africa.

Jamal Saghir, Director of Energy and Water, World Bank, discussed 
water infrastructure development in Africa, stressing the links 
between water and poverty and the extent of the infrastructure 
challenges ahead. He commended the work of AMCOW and emphasized 
the need to achieve water security in the region in order to 
achieve international development goals.

Noting that France has committed to doubling its efforts in water 
and sanitation, Jean-Christophe Deberre, French Ministry of 
Foreign Affairs, discussed the role of external support agencies 
in water development in Africa. He stressed the need for effective 
follow-up efforts, collective action, intelligence gathering and 
mobilization.

Michel Jarraud, World Meteorological Organization, discussed 
climate change and risk management challenges in Africa. He 
described the extreme impacts of droughts and floods in Africa and 
their links to climate change, and stressed the need to recognize, 
forecast and plan for these extremes and to monitor and gather 
accurate information to effectively assess, manage and mitigate 
risk. 

During the session, African children delivered a message to the 
4th Forum, urging participants to work with them as future leaders 
of Africa in delivering water to the continent.

KEYNOTE ADDRESS

Anna Tibaijuka described a vision of the world where all people 
can access safe water and basic sanitation. Noting the 3rd World 
Water Forum’s call for commitments and partnerships, Tibaijuka 
highlighted that cooperation between UN-HABITAT and the Asian 
Development Bank since the 3rd Forum has brought US$ 300 million 
in investments in water and sanitation for the poor in Asia. She 
expressed her support for the 4th Forum’s focus on local actions, 
saying that water and sanitation conflicts have to be resolved at 
the local level. 

Addressing the key challenge of urbanization for achieving the 
MDGs, Tibaiujka emphasized urbanization as a core public issue in 
gross neglect, noted the targets are not being met, and said that 
UN-HABITAT and the World Bank are working together to put slums on 
the world agenda. She also noted that the water supply and 
sanitation crisis has to be viewed as a crisis of governance, and 
urged: sound policies and political will; national and 
international leadership for change; and country-level poverty 
reduction strategies to reflect the MDG targets on water, 
sanitation and human settlements.

Tibaijuka lamented that Africa is not on track to meet the MDGs 
and, noting that donor funding for water and sanitation is 
declining, and called for implementation of policies to assist 
developing countries. She addressed the need for “quick impact” 
initiatives, such as the Lake Victoria Region Water and Sanitation 
Initiative, and highlighted the challenge of developing monitoring 
mechanisms that reflect the voices of poor communities. 

LAUNCH OF THE “WATER AND SANITATION IN THE WORLD’S CITIES” REPORT: 
In presenting the report “Achieving Global Goals in Small Urban 
Centers: Water and Sanitation in the World’s Cities,” Tibaijuka 
drew attention to the importance of addressing water and 
sanitation needs in rapidly growing small urban settlements to 
achieve the MDGs. Noting that a quarter of the world’s population 
lives in these centers and that clean piped water and adequate 
sanitation are often too costly for small local communities, she 
highlighted two sustainable solutions for reducing the cost of 
water delivery: condominal water supply systems, as applied in 
Durban, South Africa, La Paz, Bolivia, and Buenos Aires, 
Argentina; and community taps like those used Mandaue City, the 
Phillipines. She also mentioned the Orangi Pilot Project in 
Pakistan and the community-designed and managed toilet blocks in 
Tirupur, India, as models of low-cost improved sanitation. 

THEMATIC SESSIONS

WATER RIGHTS: Three thematic sessions addressed the issue of water 
rights.

Human right to water: The session, chaired by Emilio Alvarez Icaza 
Longoria, Mexico City’s Human Rights Commission, explored the 
theme of the human right to water using rural and urban case 
studies from Mexico. 

Lorena Viniegra Velázquez, Ra’yo deje (“New Water”), presented on 
Ra’yo deje’s programme of extra-curricular educational and 
awareness-raising activities which help children in rural 
communities to explore the right to life. She argued that children 
have the capacity to drive change because they are eager to enact 
what they learn.

Héctor Rosas, Casa y Ciudad, described an urban neighborhood 
project that seeks to facilitate the right to housing and water, 
and entails the conservation of water through rooftop rainwater 
collection for subsequent diversion into infiltration wells and 
ultimately into groundwater systems.

Alejandra Serrano Pavón, Mexican Center for Environmental Rights, 
stressed the need to recognize the human right to water not only 
in laws but also in actions. She said local authorities need to 
consider social and environmental issues along with technical and 
budgetary ones, and emphasized the importance of finding local and 
practical solutions to water-related problems and raising public 
awareness.

Georgina Sandoval, Casa y Ciudad, noted that urban and rural 
experiences in trying to ensure the human right to water share 
commonalities. She lamented the lack of opportunities for civil 
society to engage in a dialogue regarding a human right to water.

Securing the right to water: From the local to the global, civil 
society perspectives: Maude Barlow, The Council of Canadians, 
highlighted the “mighty contest” for access to water between 
development banks, transnational corporations, some governments 
and global civil society. She called for a binding UN treaty 
guaranteeing every citizen on Earth the right to water. 

Stephen Shrybman, Sack Goldblatt Mitchell LLP, stressed the 
importance of the International Covenant on Economic and Social 
Rights as a mechanism requiring governments to implement the right 
to sufficient and clean water.

Arvind Kejriwal, Right to Water Campaign, shared the experience of 
water privatization in New Delhi, India, highlighting the use of 
the Right to Information Act, which he said mobilized civil 
society to pressure the Government to relinquish a Word Bank water 
project.

Danielle Mitterrand, France Libertés, emphasized that all human 
beings should have free access to 40 litres of water daily. She 
noted some convergence in discourses between civil society and 
some major institutions at the 4th Forum, including on recognizing 
the right to water for all and shortcomings of public-private 
partnerships.

María Cruz de Paz, Mazahua, highlighted the Mexican indigenous 
Mazahua movement, which campaigns for an integrated sustainable 
water plan in Mexico.

Santiago Arconada Rodriguez, Venezuela’s Ministry of Environment, 
stated that water is a birthright and argued that if water 
commercialization continues, the 21st Century will be plagued by 
armed conflict.

Joan Brown, Franciscan Sister, said water has a profound spiritual 
significance and is essential for justice and peace. She noted 
that the sacredness of water is jeopardized by its 
commercialization, contamination and unfair distribution, and that 
people should assume the role of caretakers.

Julián Perez, El-Alto, described fierce public opposition in 
Bolivia against the privatization of the water sector, which 
people felt failed to deliver on its promises. Noting that 
reinvestment of the substantial private profits could have helped 
avert the water crisis, he said his government lacks the political 
will to enable the retraction of concessions. 

Frank Mantis, Canadian Union of Public Employees, highlighted his 
organization’s national lobbying efforts and global justice 
initiatives to fight privatization.

Richard Bricks Mokolo, Orange Farm Water Crisis Committee, 
narrated a South African town’s struggle against the privatization 
of water through prepaid water meters.

Roberto Cruz, The Council of Canadians, argued that those calling 
for a right to water represent not a threat, as some politicians 
believe, but a different voice that deserves to be heard.

Wenonah Hauter, Food and Water Watch, favored a progressive tax 
system over user fees whereby the poor also have to pay. She 
called for a UN treaty to protect the right to water both for 
people and for nature. 

In the ensuing discussion, a private operators’ representative 
supported the right to water, expressed respect for the viewpoints 
presented and asked for the opportunity to highlight the 
contribution of privatization to achieving the MDGs. His statement 
was not made in full as the session was brought to a close.

Right to water: What does it mean and how to implement it: Session 
Chair Bertrand Charrier, Green Cross International, called for 
stronger political will to realize access to water for all. 
Addressing challenges surrounding the right to water, he said it 
sometimes conflicts with sustainable natural resources management. 

Loïc Fauchon, WWC President, presented the WWC report “The right 
to water: what does it mean and how to implement it?” noting that 
it identifies necessary conditions for guaranteeing the right to 
water and calling for an expanded dialogue.

Henri Smets, French Water Academy, highlighted the UN General 
Assembly Resolution in which States recognized the rights to food 
and clean water. He stressed the need to identify the rights and 
responsibilities of public authorities and users, and to share the 
costs of water supply and sanitation. Advocating solidarity taxes, 
he said governments have a choice to subsidize water for the 
poorest. 

Paul Van Hofwegen, WWC, highlighted findings from the WWC report, 
including that national governments are responsible for enabling 
the right to water through legislation and real multi-year action 
plans with budget allocation, and that protection of water 
resources must be included in implementation of the right to 
water.

Houria Tazi Sadeq, Maghreb-Mashreq Alliance for Water (ALMAE), 
noted that the right to water is: widely recognized in 
international law; makes the executive branch accountable at 
local, national and international levels; and could help with 
conflict resolution and human migration.

Jabu Sindane, Director of South Africa’s Department of Water 
Affairs and Forestry, said his government provides free basic 
water to the poorest, which is financed from federal grants and 
municipal taxes. As challenges, he identified the actual 
availability of water, non-payment by those who can afford to pay, 
and lack of capacity at local level.

Adriana Blanco, Uruguay’s Ministry of Environment, said her 
country provides basic water services to those who need them, 
which were implemented through strong commitment of the State and 
contributions of society at large. 

Noting that a right to water was adopted in the Belgian 
Constitution, Phillippe Boury, Walloon Water Society, highlighted 
outcomes of its implementation in three regions, including its 
role in moderating price increases and ensuring a more just 
redistribution. 

Anna Tsvetkova, Mama-86, described how civil society, through a 
grassroots initiative, helped draft water supply legislation, 
noting it facilitated the development of clear mechanisms that 
solve water problems at the local level.

Majida Zahraouim, ALMAE, described a study that examined water 
quality’s impact on health in a Moroccan shantytown and stressed 
that health is an important aspect of sustainable development. 

Ashfaq Khalfan, Center on Housing Rights and Evictions, said 
“right to water” has been adequately defined by the UN Commission 
for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and called for focus on 
implementation. Noting that several UN instruments obligate 
developed countries to assist the poorest, he said States in 
violation of these instruments can be taken to court.

Eszter Somogyi, Hungarian Metropolitan Research Institute, said 
payment for services has to be based on actual consumption. She 
presented a case study of a lawsuit against a private company that 
was won by a consumer protection agency, noting its relevance to 
the affordability of services.

PUBLIC POLICIES FOR WATER AND SANITATION SERVICES: Chair Jesús 
Campos López, CONAGUA, opened the session. Blanca Alicia Mendoza 
Vera, CONAGUA, elaborated on the devolution of rights and 
responsibilities to Mexican water and sanitation operators through 
a financing scheme based on federal loans. Noting that this has 
resulted in improvements in water quality, operator efficiency and 
leakage control, she highlighted local action and participation of 
authorities ranging from the local to the federal level.

Lombardo Guajardo, Director of Operator Agencies of Monterrey, 
said Mexico’s new financing scheme is a successful example of 
decentralization. Noting the advantages of such a scheme to his 
organization and to the quality of water services, he said the 
financing scheme, combined with increased commercial efficiency, 
has enabled water operations to be truly profitable.

Eduardo Ibañez Mariño, CONAGUA, addressed the modernization of the 
work of Mexican water and sanitation operators. He said that 
although an unharmonized legislative framework hampers 
modernization, the situation is improving, including through 
private sector involvement under clear and transparent rules to 
ensure that the public benefits.

Daniel Chacón Anaya, Ecological Transboundary Cooperation 
Commission (COCEF), and Jorge Garcés, North American Development 
Bank (NADBANK), presented on the activities of COCEF, an 
initiative aimed at promoting development along the US-Mexican 
border. Chacón Anaya explained that the initiative’s mandate 
includes addressing water pollution, wastewater treatment and 
recycling, and highlighted public participation in COCEF projects 
in both Mexico and the US. Noting that public sector budgets only 
cover 30 percent of water and sanitation needs in the area, Garcés 
outlined NADBANK’s investments in the sector.

Helmut Jung, Austrian Development Agency, said Austrian 
development cooperation regarding water and sanitation aims at 
local and regional involvement, capacity building and awareness 
raising, while focusing on cross-sectoral themes, such as gender 
equity and environmental sustainability. He described a case study 
from Mozambique on improving local governance. 

Addressing strengthening local actors, Ilya Cardoza, Nicaraguan 
Network of Water and Sanitation (RASNIC), said RASNIC promotes 
cooperation between national and international partners to 
coordinate policies and strategies on the ground. She said 
modernization focuses on institutional restructuring, defining the 
roles of different actors and developing regulations for operator 
services.

Juan Pablo Schifini, Inter-American Association for Sanitary and 
Environmental Engineering, discussed the decentralization of 
Argentina’s water services. Noting disadvantages of unplanned and 
unregulated private sector involvement, he said sector 
modernization in his country is progressing.

Franz Rojas Ortuste, German Technical Cooperation (GTZ), addressed 
Latin-American experiences with water policies. Noting that the 
water sector’s institutional frameworks in the region are 
sometimes incoherent, he called for capacity building and the 
promotion of a “water culture.”

DELIVERING ON THE MDGs IN THREE YEARS: A MODEL-SETTING REGIONAL 
INITIATIVE: Anna Tibaijuka, UN-HABITAT and Chair of the session, 
introduced the Lake Victoria Region Water and Sanitation 
Initiative, a partnership formed in 2004 between the governments 
of Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda and UN-HABITAT to deliver water and 
sanitation services to secondary urban centers around Lake 
Victoria. She noted that the Initiative was designed to show that 
MDGs can be met with modest investments and often through 
improvements to existing infrastructure.

Graham Alabaster, UN-HABITAT, provided an overview of the 
Initiative. He described the challenges in developing a regional 
programme that has to fit into three different national structures 
and that effectively engages stakeholders and builds on existing 
capacity in each one.

William Tsimwa Muhairwe, National Water and Sewerage Corporation 
(NWSC), presented on NWSC’s experiences in sustaining new 
investments in water and sanitation for small towns through 
capacity building in Uganda. He explained that NWSC uses cross-
subsidies and the application of affordable consumption tariffs to 
ensure financial sustainability of water and sanitation services.

Patrick Ombogo, Lake Victoria South Water Service Board, described 
how the creation of Kenya’s 2002 Water Act enabled a policy shift, 
leading to improved water and sanitation services in Kenya. He 
noted as challenges the continuation of staff and attitudes from 
old institutions and the acceptance of the need to pay for water 
and sanitation services.

Dauda Karumuna, Tanzania’s Bukoba Town Council, presented on 
engaging communities in water and sanitation. He described the 
process by which stakeholders in three communities were engaged 
in: identifying needs, selecting domestic water points and 
appropriate technologies, and establishing use, operation and 
maintenance regulations, and management committees.

In the ensuing panel discussion, Juliet Kiguli, Makerere 
University, highlighted the Initiative’s inclusion of women and 
children. Peter Mangiti, Kenya’s Ministry of Water and Irrigation, 
noted that to sustain community and political support, reform is 
required. Dominic Kavutse, Uganda’s Directorate of Water 
Development, emphasized the importance of the Initiative to rural 
development and slowing urbanization. Tibaijuka emphasized the 
environmental component of the project.

At the close of the session, John Mutua Katuku, Kenya’s Minister 
for Water and Irrigation, read the Communiqué of the East African 
Ministers to the Initiative.

THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE CONTROVERSY IN WATER AND SANITATION: LESSONS IN 
THE LIGHT OF THE MDGs’ REQUIREMENTS: Cornelia Nauen, European 
Commission (EC), reviewed lessons learned from EC-supported IWRM 
development and implementation projects worldwide, examining how 
they promote sustainable development in water management. She said 
there is a lack of awareness of the political nature of resources 
allocation, which is an obstacle to engagement, communication and 
positive impacts.

José Esteban Castro, PRINWASS, presented findings from the 
PRINWASS research programme on barriers and conditions for private 
investment in water supply and sanitation, reporting that case 
studies show that: in most cases private funds were a small 
percentage of investment; privatization required public funding; 
and the private sector was not more efficient than the public 
sector. He drew attention to chronic weaknesses in the regulatory 
ability of states vis-à-vis the private sector, leading to 
difficulties in follow-up and to non-compliance, and underscored 
that water scarcity is an institutional and political problem.

María Luisa Torregrosa, Latin American Faculty of Social Sciences 
(FLACSO), pointed to structural socio-economic and demographic 
problems as underlying challenges to provide access to water. She 
said disparities in the urban infrastructure made it difficult to 
redirect the necessary investment for building basic 
infrastructure, and that falling incomes and a decrease in living 
standards since the 1980s and 1990s have resulted in the poor 
having little or no capacity to cover basic services.

Calling water an “uncooperative commodity,” Erik Swyngedouw, 
University of Oxford, noted that private sector participation in 
the water sector is not new, and stated that policy makers have 
not learned the lessons from the past. Urging thinking “outside 
the water box,” he said the “radical political nature of water” 
and the limits of market mechanisms must be recognized. 

Carlos Crespo Flores, Mayor University of San Simón, discussed 
Bolivian water disputes arising from the privatization of water 
services in that country, describing the social and political 
conditions and water policy history in Bolivia. He noted problems 
regarding lack of transparency in decision making and operations, 
unfair bidding practices, a lack of interest in expanding services 
to the poor, and inequitable, profit-oriented policies.

Vereador Carlos Todeschini, Municipal Council of Porto Alegre, 
Brazil, described the city’s experiences negotiating a concession 
for water services to private companies as part of a project to 
improve infrastructure in the city. He said governments must not 
submit to special interests, particularly in the face of powerful 
private companies.

Antonio Miranda, Brazilian Association of Municipal Water and 
Sanitation Public Operators, discussed public debates over how the 
City of Recife, Brazil, should manage water services. Noting a 
municipal decision not to privatize, he described loan 
negotiations with the World Bank resulting in excluding a loan 
agreement clause on privatization. He urged cooperation among 
operators, improved financing and stronger public sector 
performance.

In the ensuing discussion, participants addressed: both positive 
and negative experiences with private sector involvement; the 
difference between water treatment and water extraction and supply 
and the implications of private sector involvement in these; and 
the distortion resulting from offering subsidies to the private 
sector instead of to the poor.

SAFE DRINKING WATER FOR ALL: Ricardo Torres, Pan American Health 
Organization (PAHO), provided a conceptual overview of Water 
Safety Plans (WSPs), noting their benefits, including: access to 
safe drinking water, low cost, and development of self-esteem and 
teamwork. He also addressed constraints to WSPs, including a lack 
of trained personnel and water management agencies’ reservations 
in making new assessments. 

Richard Davis, Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 
discussed the implementation of WSPs, noting the partnership 
between PAHO, CDC and the US Environmental Protection Agency. He 
described the WSP Demonstration Project in Spanish Town, Jamaica, 
which aims to demonstrate how WSPs can be applied to all types of 
communities.

Dennis Martenson, American Society of Civil Engineers, said 
engineers can provide technical support in IWRM, stream flow 
measurement, development and management, hydraulic modeling and 
environmental protection and restoration, and said the engineering 
community can help develop sound water management.

Noting that Mexico is lagging behind in the provision of drinking 
water and sanitation in rural areas, Damián Robledo Gómez, North 
American Alliance for Civil Engineering, described the benefits of 
clean water for local, regional and national development and 
poverty alleviation. 

Miguel Angel Alatorre Mendieta, National Autonomous University of 
Mexico (UNAM), proposed a solution for cleaning up Mexican lagoons 
through the installation of water treatment plants upstream to be 
powered by tidal energy.

PUBLIC STATE POLICY IMPACT ON DRINKING WATER SERVICE DELIVERY 
SUPPLY AND SANITATION FOR URBAN USE: Salomón Abedrop López, 
President of Mexico’s National Association of Water and Sanitation 
Companies (ANEAS), opened the session. 

Arturo Pedraza Martinez, Watergy Mexico, presented on state public 
policy on drinking water and sewerage. He noted that 11 million 
people do not have access to drinking water and 23 million are 
lacking sewerage systems in Mexico, while only 31 percent of 
wastewater is being treated and an equal percentage of water is 
lost before reaching the user due to infrastructure deficiencies. 
Noting that energy costs represent a heavy burden for water and 
sanitation systems, he proposed a joint administration for water 
and energy. Pedraza Martinez also urged public policy to focus on 
and invest in water systems efficiency rather than building new 
infrastructure, which is less profitable and often triggers 
environmental and social problems. 

Rolando Springall Galindo, President of the Water System Council 
of Veracruz, described how the Veracruz Water System Board manages 
drinking water and sanitation in this Mexican state. He said that 
the Board has the legal authority; brings together state and 
municipal authorities; calculates the tariffs for water and 
sanitation services; operates a hydrological information system; 
and undertakes awareness raising and training projects. 

Andrés Ruiz Morcillo, Director General, Commission for Drinking 
Water and Sewerage of Quintana Roo, elaborated on public water 
policies in Mexico. He said while legislative frameworks are in 
place, legal provisions need to be standardized and better aligned 
with sustainable development objectives. He highlighted the 
problem of compliance, and noted several disconnects between 
policy and practice, including: no mandatory requirement to ensure 
water efficiency in the agriculture sector; insufficient 
enforcement of the “polluter pays” principle; lack of concrete 
measures to apply the concept of all users paying for water; and 
uncertainties regarding the cross-subsidization of rural and urban 
water users.

Mauricio Gonzalez, NADBANK, focused on water-related public 
policies in municipalities along the US-Mexican border. He 
identified a number of policy interventions to address current 
challenges, including: state cooperation schemes to even out the 
conditions across municipalities; separating political and 
administrative functions within municipalities to avoid conflicts 
of interest; harmonizing municipal practices; extending municipal 
authorities’ service terms to ensure continuity; addressing 
escalating costs through financial self-sufficiency and inter-
municipal coordination to achieve economy of scale; and 
strengthening institutional and human capacities.

Ricardo Sandoval Minero, Water State Commission of Guanajuato, 
urged better analysis of water management systems in Mexico. He 
said water availability should not be used beyond its renewable 
potential.

Enrique Dau Flores, Director General, Water State Commission of 
Jalisco, said the Mexican central government authority over water 
issues should be transferred to state entities, which are closer 
to the local population and more efficient at solving water 
problems. 

Noting the different local characteristics of water problems in 
each Mexican state, Eduardo Mestre, Latin American Network, said 
solutions to these problems cannot follow a single pattern, system 
or law. He said the investment recovery of water rates in many 
developing countries is being achieved by means of subsidies and 
that Mexico must better learn how to subsidize. He favored either 
a public or private system as long as it can provide quality 
services for everyone and called for further debate on 
interactions among governments, the private sector, and users. 

SERVICE DELIVERY AND LOCAL EMPOWERMENT: TURNAROUND OF PUBLIC 
UTILITIES: Muhairwe presented on the history of the Uganda’s 
National Water and Sewerage Corporation, highlighting the 
importance of a committed Board of Directors with clear 
objectives, government and donor commitment, and autonomy through 
decentralization. Noting that the public sector can deliver 
adequate performance if well managed, he underscored the 
importance of flexibility to ensure innovation and financial 
sustainability. 

Marlon Lara, Honduras’ Minister for the Social Investment Fund, 
spoke about his experience, as former Mayor of the City of Puerto 
Cortés, conceding water services and creating a mixed-capital 
company as part of municipal reform. He underscored the importance 
of public participation and awareness raising in decentralization.

Osward Chanda, Zambia’s National Water Supply and Sanitation 
Council, spoke about regulating commercial utilities and 
addressing needs of the poor. He highlighted the difference 
between regulating water resources and water supply and 
sanitation, and emphasized the importance of: transparency to 
regulate system providers; making performance figures public; 
autonomy; and lean business structures.

Sandoval Minero presented on the linking role of states in 
enabling local operating capabilities at the municipal level in 
Mexico. Noting that water is a responsibility shared among 
authorities, he recommended a coordination-oriented approach 
instead of regulatory bodies, and said that investing in 
institutional strengthening is crucial. 

In the discussion, participants spoke about: performance rewards 
and penalties; public participation in management decisions; 
addressing children and youth; the public ethos among public 
servants; and the public’s willingness to pay. 

DESALINATION OF SEAWATER IN THE MIDDLE EAST: Stating that 
freshwater resources are scarce while both population and per 
capita water consumption rates are increasing, Session Chair Ali 
Al-Tokhais, Deputy Minister for Water Affairs of Saudi Arabia, 
said desalination of water is a solution for meeting future 
freshwater demands. 

Fehied Al-Shareef, Saline Water Conversion Corporation (SWCC), 
described the growing global demand for freshwater and need to 
rely on desalination services to meet these demands. He outlined 
SWCC’s work in expanding desalination activities and the potential 
for future growth, noting that development of this technology must 
be cost-effective and environmentally friendly.

Abdul Maghrabi, SWCC, explained the technical processes of 
desalination, comparing the capacity and other aspects of 
different types of desalination plants. 

Sergio Alcocer, UNAM, presented a research project on sea- and 
brackish water desalination through renewable energy. He 
highlighted several initiatives in Mexico, including harnessing 
the energy of hot seawater vents on the coast of Baja California, 
solar radiation in the north, and tidal currents in the Yucatan 
Peninsula.

Noting that there are currently 17,000 desalination units around 
the world, Leon Awerbuch, Chairman of the International 
Desalination Association, observed that desalination is no longer 
a research idea, but has a rapidly growing global market. He 
stressed that desalination is the only hope to create additional 
freshwater resources in the face of water crises and conflicts, 
and that the industry is striving towards making desalinized water 
available to the global community at an affordable price.

Khalefa Al-Fraij, Kuwait’s Ministry of Energy, Electricity and 
Water, outlined the history of desalination in his country, 
highlighting its first water desalination plant inaugurated in 
1953. 

Muhammed Al-Ghamdi, SWCC, described desalination in Saudi Arabia 
focusing on the SWCC’s history, operations and research 
activities. He said SWCC’s invested more than US $16 billion in 
the construction of its plants, which produce and export both 
water and energy.

In the ensuing discussion, participants discussed the use of 
renewable energy, and considering desalination as an activity 
under the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Clean 
Development Mechanism. Responding to a question whether nuclear 
energy could be used in desalination, Awerbuch said it would be 
difficult to convince the public to buy desalinized “nuclear 
water.” Participants also discussed the environmental impacts such 
as emissions, excessive salinity, and seawater pollution.




The World Water Forum Bulletin is a publication of the 
International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, publishers of the Earth Negotiations Bulletin © 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. This issue was written and edited by Nienke 
Beintema, Robynne Boyd, Xenya Cherny, Alexandra Conliffe, Bo-Alex 
Fredvik, María Gutiérrez, and Hugh Wilkins. The photographer is 
Leila Mead. The digital editor is Dan Birchall.The editor is 
Alexis Conrad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. The Director of IISD Reporting 
Services is Langston James “Kimo” Goree VI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. 
Funding for coverage of this meeting has been provided by 4th 
World Water Forum Secretariat. IISD can be contacted at 161 
Portage Avenue East, 6th Floor, Winnipeg, Manitoba R3B 0Y4, 
Canada; tel: +1-204-958-7700; fax: +1-204-958-7710. The opinions 
expressed in the Bulletin are those of the authors and do not 
necessarily reflect the views of IISD. Excerpts from the Bulletin 
may be used in other publications with appropriate academic 
citation. Electronic versions of the Bulletin are sent to e-mail 
distribution lists (ASCII and PDF format) and can be found on the 
Linkages WWW-server at <http://www.iisd.ca/>. For information on 
the Bulletin, including requests to provide reporting services, 
contact the Director of IISD Reporting Services at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 
+1-646-536-7556 or 212 East 47th St. #21F, New York, NY 10017, USA. 
The IISD team at the 4th World Water Forum can be contacted by 
e-mail at <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

You are currently subscribed to enb as: [email protected] 
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Subscribe to IISD Reporting Services' free newsletters and lists for 
environment and sustainable development policy professionals at 
http://www.iisd.ca/email/subscribe.htm

Reply via email to