I'm quite interested in these results as well. I saw there was someone using for an xbox/360 game a while ago and I know their TCR (technical certification requirements) test against bad network conditions. Bad network conditions being relatively low bandwidth, high latency and a certain percentage of packet loss over time. Could that person mention at all if there was any problems going through cert/tcr testing in respects to network conditions? /Erik B.
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 4:42 AM, Aaron Boxer <[email protected]> wrote: > Great. This sounds like the perfect library for my application. > > I am streaming currency rates using TCP at the moment; the client is at an > arbitrary > IP address on the internet. To maintain "real time" streaming, the packet > size is small, > so the TCP header size / packet size is quite large. The connection must be > reliable. > > It looks like ENet would give me a better header/payload ratio. > > Thanks! > > Aaron > > > Lee Salzman wrote: > >> The library was developed and tuned for 56K modem usage, perhaps which is >> sort of a joke in this day and age. :) >> >> There is no particular roadmap for new features. The library has just >> grown stuff >> as Sauerbraten has needed the features. Thus, it tends to be rather stable >> over >> time, and it's even pretty safe to fork the code or do whatever with it >> rather than >> treat it as a normal library because of that. >> >> Lee >> >> Aaron Boxer wrote: >> >>> Thanks. How much testing has been done under high packet loss? >>> >>> Also, in general, what are the known issues with the library? >>> >>> Is there a roadmap for new features? >>> >>> >>> Thanks again >>> >>> >>> >>> Lee Salzman wrote: >>> >>>> It uses pings or reliable packets to measure the mean round trip time >>>> for the connection. >>>> Any excessive deviation from this causes a throttle to oscillate up or >>>> down, which regulates >>>> how often ENet will drop unreliable packets to reduce bandwidth usage. >>>> >>>> Lee >>>> >>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> ENet-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss >> > _______________________________________________ > ENet-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss >
_______________________________________________ ENet-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
