There are unreliable, unsequenced packets - just no reliable,
unsequenced packets. You just use ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNSEQUENCED. However,
they use an entirely different bookkeeping scheme.
Lee
M. Rijks wrote:
Ah, that makes perfect sense. Clever solution. Come to mention it,
that also somewhat clarifies the absence of unreliable unsequenced
packets in the model.
Thank you for the detailed explanation, Lee.
Martin
_______________________________________________
ENet-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
