I know I could use different channels to get the result I want but I was
curious about the expected behavior using a single channel.
Suppose if I had sent 100 unreliable packets, followed by one reliable
packet, followed by 50 more unreliable packets. In what order should I
expect them to arrive?
* Would I first get the 100 unreliable (in any order, if at all),
followed by the reliable, follows by the 50 unreliable (in any
order, if at all)?
* Would I get these 151 packets in any order with only the reliable
one guaranteed to arrive?
I am also under the impression that the second batch of 50 unreliable
packets would not start to arrive (if at all) until after the one
reliable one has arrived?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nicholas J Ingrassellino
LifebloodNetworks.com <http://www.lifebloodnetworks.com/> ||
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
"The idea that I can be presented with a problem, set out to logically
solve it with the tools at hand, and wind up with a program that could
not be legally used because someone else followed the same logical steps
some years ago and filed for a patent on it is horrifying."
- John Carmack on software patents
_______________________________________________
ENet-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
