For a suitable paypal donation I might be encouraged to add an unreliable fragment option. ;)
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Alexander Dolgansky <[email protected]>wrote: > Yes that's one of the options that I currently looking at. > > The reason why I need it in my project is because I have a large > number of data points that need to be sent out as one message at a > certain rate. > Therefore, each message needs to be sent out only once to keep up with > the overall sending rate. If message pieces arrive out of order or it > is not possible to send out > all of the pieces due to network issues, the whole message must be > dropped. This is the required behavior for some of the messages that I > need to transfer between nodes. > > Although splitting the data into smaller chucks is a valid solution to > my problem, I am wondering if ENet can do it for me. > After all, ENet already fragments any message that is larger than MTU, > so it is just a matter of figuring out how I can force ENet to > send fragments unreliably. > > Is it possible to accomplish what I am trying to do with ENet with > only minor changes to the source code? > > If yes, I would love to get pointers on how I should modify the source > code. > > Thanks. > > Alexander. > _______________________________________________ > ENet-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss >
_______________________________________________ ENet-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
