It sounds important, but I'm not sure what you mean with 'regression in packet queing'. Is it important in every-day use, or is it an uncommon scenario?
Ruud On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 3:30 PM, Philip Bennefall <[email protected]>wrote: > Thanks Lee, have downloaded this and will upgrade my engine. Aappreciate > all the work you put into this library! > > Kind regards, > > Philip Bennefall > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Lee Salzman" <[email protected]> > To: "Discussion of the ENet library" <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 4:26 AM > Subject: [ENet-discuss] ENet 1.3.2 and 1.2.4 released! > > > While I was investigating how to do unreliable fragmenting, I came across a > super silly regression in unreliable packet queuing. So this release is sort > of a twofer, you get unreliable fragmenting option via > ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNRELIABLE_FRAGMENT and the bug fix (so upgrading is > recommended). No protocol breakage was done, so it is compatible. > > ENet 1.3.2 download link: > http://enet.bespin.org/download/enet-1.3.2.tar.gz > ENet 1.2.4 download link: > http://enet.bespin.org/download/enet-1.2.4.tar.gz > > ChangeLog: > > ENet 1.3.2 (May 31, 2011): > > * added support for unreliable packet fragmenting via the packet flag > ENET_PACKET_FLAG_UNRELIABLE_FRAGMENT > * fixed regression in unreliable packet queuing > * added check against received port to limit some forms of IP-spoofing > > ENet 1.2.4 (May 31, 2011): > > * fixed regression in unreliable packet queuing > * added check against received port to limit some forms of IP-spoofing > > _______________________________________________ > ENet-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss > _______________________________________________ > ENet-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss >
_______________________________________________ ENet-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
