I am O.K. with 36% but I am seeing 0%. Correct me if I am wrong but even a 200 fragment message should arrive with probability of 13% assuming 1% packet loss. Obviously this is a very low probability but still not 0%.
I am trying to reduce data size as much as possible to increase my chances of getting the data across, but I would like to understand if I've managed to reach the limit of what unreliable message delivery can accomplish given my network setup or there is still a bug somewhere (could be on my side as well) that prevents the most optimal throughput. Alexander. On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 4:17 AM, Ruud van Gaal <[email protected]> wrote: > Even on a 1Gb LAN, I've experience severe packet drops. However, that was > with ~30 PC's talking to eachother at around 100Hz on a few channels (so > quite a lot of data flying around). > I'd say a method where you get packets that are split into 200 fragments > might need a bit of redesigning, to send out smaller chunks of data (and > more chance of them all arriving). > > Cheers, > Ruud > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 2:53 AM, Chris Jurney <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> If you send 100 packets with 99% reliability, there is a 36% chance of >> getting them all there. >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Alexander Dolgansky <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> That's a fair point but what bothers me about this somewhat is the >>> fact that I was able to get these large messages before (perhaps they >>> weren't 200 fragments long but definitely twice as large as the kind >>> of messages that I can send now). Perhaps packet loss is more severe >>> now but the last time I checked it was less than a percent (I don't >>> know how accurate that measure was thought). >>> >>> Anyways, I'll experiment some more with what I can send unreliably >>> with the updated ENet given my setup but as I mentioned before, the >>> update did improve things so I am very happy about that. >>> >>> Alexander. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> ENet-discuss mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> ENet-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss >> > > > _______________________________________________ > ENet-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss > _______________________________________________ ENet-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cubik.org/mailman/listinfo/enet-discuss
