Le mercredi 22 juin 2016 à 09:56 -0700, Adelia Rahim a écrit :
> If I have to choose only one to include, I would choose the yearly
> summary since the top 5 lists are more useful only when analysed and
> extended and explained in the report.
Yeah...
> The summary however, makes sense when viewed together over the years (e.g. 3
> years) > –> since the objective is to give an idea of the level of activity
> happening in the project – rather than broken up.
Does it, though? Sure, I could plot a decade-long stacked bars or
stacked lines chart that shows the activity varying slightly (and
generally going slowly downwards), but is that helpful engagement-wise?
Besides the moderate downwards trend, those stats are pretty much the
same every year: about 25±3k new bug reports, 25±3k resolved reports,
and 46±3k remaining open bug reports... so I'm not sure the multi-year
comparison is terribly useful in the grand scheme of things?
_______________________________________________
engagement-list mailing list
engagement-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/engagement-list
